Search for: "People v. Giles"
Results 81 - 100
of 212
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2016, 2:06 pm
We have seen such agreements raised before, for instance in London Borough of Southwark v Ofogba [2012] EWHC 1620 (QB), Lambeth LBC v Thomas (1997) 30 HLR 89 and Rochdale MBC v Dixon [2011] EWCA Civ 1173. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 1:46 pm
The case of Nzolameso v Westminster has made it too difficult. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 12:49 pm
After a lengthy trek through Bubb, Puhlhofer, Cocks v Thanet District Council [1983] 2 AC 286, Ferdous Begum and R v Northavon District Council ex parte Palmer (1994) 26 HLR 572, the court concluded that Wednesbury was the appropriate test and further that “the range of rational decisions” was not so narrow as to determine the outcome. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 12:00 pm
Each of these efforts succumbed, however, to forces unleashed by Cruikshank and immunized by subsequent Supreme Court decisions, most prominently Giles v. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 2:24 pm
We are facing diverse problems, so need diverse people to tackle them. [read post]
1 Jan 2016, 1:13 pm
The post Just walk away (beforehand) by Giles Peaker appeared first on Nearly Legal: Housing Law News and Comment. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:46 pm
From Young v. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 4:32 am
In particular, in the Stanford v. [read post]
19 Dec 2015, 9:57 am
She feels particularly vulnerable to most people being men late at night, often under the influence of alcohol. [read post]
3 Nov 2015, 7:00 am
In which the Nearly Legal team gain exclusive access to a (highly) fictionalised account of one man’s inside view of legislation currently going through Parliament, insofar as it relates to housing *** Morley Peckwitch, Member of Parliament for Dunny-on-the-Wold, leaned against the bar in the Smoking Room. [read post]
10 Oct 2015, 2:15 am
I understand the notes are to be corrected for the 2016 edition, but in the meantime, people should be aware of the problem. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 3:02 pm
Nearly. by Giles Peaker appeared first on Nearly Legal: Housing Law News and Comment. [read post]
8 Aug 2015, 5:08 pm
Following R (Jakimaviciute) v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC [2014] EWCA Civ 1438 [our report] and Alemi, R (on the application of) v Westminster City Council [2015] EWHC 1765 (Admin) [our report], it was not permissible to set qualifying [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 1:43 pm
(NB, this is not a record of moving into work, nor does it include people returning to JSA after a short period. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 4:34 pm
Jeffrey and Curnow were defamed by statements made by Virginia Giles on a website in 2011. [read post]
22 May 2015, 5:29 am
Ferguson, Giles v. [read post]
13 May 2015, 2:09 am
This was a point of appeal from Kanu v Southwark (our report). [read post]
7 May 2015, 11:50 pm
Enter the entertaining case of Williamson v Khan. [read post]
5 May 2015, 6:00 am
And our bitterest critique seems to come, as noted before, in Chapter Eight, where pretty much every major decision of the Court -- Bradwell, The Civil Rights Cases, Plessy, Giles, Berea College, Buck v. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 2:13 pm
Barnet, again. by Giles Peaker appeared first on Nearly Legal: Housing Law News and Comment. [read post]
