Search for: "People v. Ginsberg" Results 41 - 60 of 148
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Dec 2007, 3:57 am
We were too busy - and none of our clients would pay for it in any event - so we didn't attend yesterday's Supreme Court oral argument in Riegel v. [read post]
23 Aug 2009, 8:39 am
For example the Court of Appeals in People v Rawlins and People v Meekins (10 N.Y.3d 136 [2/19/2008]), considered how Crawford applies two categories of evidence: DNA reports and , fingerprints, comparisons. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 9:29 am by Jeralyn
Because I continue to adhere to the Confrontation Clause that the People adopted, as described in Crawford v. [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 1:22 am
Instead, you get things like Rosen reporting that Stevens' "eyes [were] flashing" as he talked about Bush v. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 9:42 am by Joshua Fairfield
  Let’s get right down to it: I wanted to talk about Schwarzenegger v. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 8:16 am by Michelle O'Neil
Texas case, which extended Due Process to homosexual people and banned laws criminalizing homosexual conduct. [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 7:00 am
  This whole notion was turned on its head in 2006 when Justice Ginsberg wrote the majority opinion in Marshall v. [read post]