Search for: "People v. Giordano" Results 1 - 20 of 21
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Nov 2007, 6:27 am
Thanks to this post at Crime & Consequences, I see that earlier this week the California Supreme Court ruled in People v. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 12:38 am
Giordano Subscription Required NASSAU COUNTYCriminal Practice Court Finds Recusal Mandatory, Not Discretionary After Signing Ex Parte Search Warrant Application People v. [read post]
22 Dec 2017, 4:00 am by Sarah Sutherland
The Feldman Agency, 2017 ONCA 815, by Cory Giordano, Supreme Advocacy LLP ‘Baker v Canada: What constitutes procedural fairness? [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 6:14 pm by Eric Goldman
I previously described the case facts: “A lawyer was unhappy with a Yelp review about her. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 5:15 am by Susan Brenner
These people are the salt of the earth and there is no gray in their lives. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 5:32 am by INFORRM
Inforrm has an article on the recent decision by Twitter to ban posting images of people without their consent. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 1:08 pm by Lucie Olejnikova
Team Members: Michael Chiaramonte (2L), Vittoria Fiorenza (2L), Hanna Shoshany (3L), Victoria Wagnerman (2L) The competition involved a criminal case of People v. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 6:11 am by Eric Penzer
  A court should not employ a presumption where to do so would “elevate a legal construct above common sense” (People v Giordano, 87 NY2d 441 [1995]). [read post]
17 Feb 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
The Traditional Civil Damages Model For decades, protecting people's reputation from defamatory falsehood had been left to libel damages liability. [read post]
5 May 2021, 12:16 pm by Nathan Dorn
Sources: “Buno, Johannes,” in Allgemeine Deutsche Biographie, v. 3 (1876), p. 540–541. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 10:00 am
The tenant protections provided by the State's rent regulation laws have long been an essential measure to ensuring New York City accommodates people with a broad range of incomes, and today's decision means fewer units will fall out of the system than otherwise would have. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 3:13 pm by Betsy McKenzie
And people do not understand what they are signing up for. [read post]