Search for: "People v. Givens (1985)" Results 1 - 20 of 705
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jun 2015, 10:45 am by Geoffrey
But the principle must, in my view, be wider than that, since the court looks at appearances, ‘at the impression which would be given to other people’ (per Lord Denning, MR, in the Metropolitan Properties case at p. 599). [read post]
1 May 2018, 2:25 pm
As a result, he spent most of the time from 1985 to 2010 in prison. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 11:30 am by Alex Loomis
The PLRA does not provide a remedy to people detained on immigration charges, and injunctive and habeas relief may not have been available and would not have given them “redress for harms they have already suffered” (p. 14). [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 11:30 am by Alex Loomis
The PLRA does not provide a remedy to people detained on immigration charges, and injunctive and habeas relief may not have been available and would not have given them “redress for harms they have already suffered” (p. 14). [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 3:02 pm
Thus, defendant was clearly not given reasonable notice that the People now intend to rely upon the 1981 conviction, nor was he given an opportunity to be heard in defense against this particular conviction. [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 1:33 pm by Giles Peaker
Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council v Mailley (2022) EWHC 2328 (QB) A quick note on this possession claim, which involves a challenge to Section 87 Housing Act 1985 as incompatible with Article 8 and 14 ECHR. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 1:10 pm
Street (1985) 471 U.S. 409, 414; see also People v. [read post]
3 Oct 2008, 3:51 pm
Toney was sentenced to death in the killings of three people in the bombing of a mobile home near Lake Worth in 1985. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 6:31 am by David Markus
")Overall, the language group's argument in Paramount v. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 4:10 pm
  The responsibility of the state to provide exculpatory evidence to the defense was articulated in the 1963 Supreme Court ruling in Brady v. [read post]