Search for: "People v. Gotham"
Results 1 - 20
of 33
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2023, 8:06 am
(People v. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 7:34 am
Circling back to New York Penal Law 155.30(5), in People v. [read post]
4 May 2009, 10:00 am
More info about the candidates, courtesy of Gotham Gazette Iguana Lounge (upstairs bar)240 W 54th St (between Broadway and 8th Avenues) E/V to 7th Avenue; 1 to 50th Street; A/C/B/D to 59th Street; N/R/Q/W to 57th Streetwww.iguananyc.com Free for members; $7/non-members Please RSVP! [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 5:40 pm
One of their many cases, Baker v. [read post]
25 Dec 2012, 6:19 pm
In People v. [read post]
3 May 2018, 5:02 am
People v. [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 7:34 am
Gotham Process Service Inc. [read post]
17 Sep 2012, 11:59 am
In that case, Lopez v. [read post]
23 Feb 2007, 3:34 pm
The Gotham West Coast Swing Club and several people had sued, saying the law violated their constitutional right to free expression. [read post]
2 May 2019, 6:21 pm
"Rumpole: "And this applies to people convicted pre-trial? [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 8:26 am
The "it" in question is the copyright and trade mark infringement action which DC Comics brought against Mark Towle (of Gotham Garage) for making and selling replica Batmobile modification kits. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 5:44 am
Cir. 2007), in awarding priority to Trilobite Ltd. based on its business contacts in Gotham. [read post]
4 Oct 2015, 2:16 am
In People v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 12:36 am
* In a flap about bats: when trade marked chiroptera come home to roostThe bat is both a lauded symbol of eastern Spain and of Gotham City's hero Robin Batman. [read post]
14 Dec 2014, 9:52 am
The Supreme Court’s decision this week in R. v. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 5:17 pm
Take, for example, Roe v. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 9:35 am
One v. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 12:41 pm
Software functions that measure people can be misleading. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 12:10 pm
As the court wrote in Gotham Air Conditioning Serv., Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 1:27 pm
The ACLU is challenging Section 3 of the misleadingly named Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) on behalf of our client Edie Windsor in Windsor v. [read post]
