Search for: "People v. Grant (1970)"
Results 61 - 80
of 530
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Sep 2022, 5:23 am
It is widely accepted that, consistent with the Dormant Commerce Clause, a firm doing multistate business must bear the cost of discovering and complying with state laws—tort laws, tax laws, franchise laws, health laws, privacy laws, and much more—everywhere it does business.[21] People and firms operating in "real space" must take steps to learn and comply with state law in places they visit or do business, or must avoid visiting or doing business in those… [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 6:41 am
This is particularly pertinent to the assessment of women, children and indigenous people as victims of eco-anxiety. [read post]
8 Aug 2022, 3:00 am
It has been effectively undermined by a series of Supreme Court decisions beginning in the 1970s: In Cohen v. [read post]
31 Jul 2022, 6:30 am
As Locke v. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 6:30 am
In 1873, in Bradwell v. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 9:00 pm
Just as Roe v. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 4:00 am
This chapter is written by Ontario Court of Appeal Justice Lorne Sossin and Angus Grant, of the Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 6:30 am
To a political scientist, one way is by viewing it as a power play by the rabbinate, an attempt many centuries before the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Cooper v Aaron to engage in a performative utterance establishing themselves as the “ultimate interpreters” of the document in question, whether the Torah or the Constitution. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 5:08 am
He noted that “anyone opposed to an agency’s mission or policies can use FOIA requests to ‘dig up dirt on the policy and the people behind it. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm
Some have argued that, because the Nation’s approach to climate change is politically contested,[1] and since these matters affect major policy questions over which Congress has not granted the SEC new, explicit powers, the Commission lacks authority to require disclosure in this area.[2] For the reasons given below, the Commission should disregard these claims, focusing instead on the challenging policy choices that any finalization of the proposal would require. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 5:00 pm
And these were people hellbent on killing and destroying people’s lives. [read post]
2 Jun 2022, 9:48 am
In Wilkins v. [read post]
15 May 2022, 8:02 pm
His mother staunchly believed his innocence, but as many people say, what mother wouldn’t? [read post]
13 May 2022, 4:00 am
It was a moment that antiabortion activists had been working toward for decades: The highest reaches of Republican power finally focused, in unison, on achieving the once implausible goal of revisiting the jurisprudence of the 1960s and 1970s, including Roe v. [read post]
[David Bernstein] Do the Ethnic Categories Used by Universities for "Diversity" Purposes Make Sense?
4 May 2022, 3:50 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in Chevron v. [read post]
2 Apr 2022, 6:46 am
” Goldberg v. [read post]
1 Apr 2022, 6:14 am
Under this larger act, the federal Controlled Substances Act was born, which grants federal jurisdiction over certain drugs, chemical substances, and plants. [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 4:00 am
The Army was called in by the federal government in 1970 using the blunt instrument of the War Measures Act, R.S.C. 1970, c. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 8:31 am
One might have hoped, post-Trump, to see the same type of energy for reform —though admittedly the partisan dynamics are less favorable to legislative cooperation today than they were in the 1970s. [read post]
