Search for: "People v. Green (1979)" Results 1 - 20 of 65
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jan 2023, 7:32 am
"EU rules require large companies and listed companies to publish regular reports on the social and environmental risks they face, and on how their activities impact people and the environment. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 9:52 am by Eugene Volokh
We lawyers have to keep such secrets about people as part of our jobs, but we're used to it, and we're handsomely compensated for it. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 9:08 am by Kyle Persaud
McCollan, 443 U.S. 137, 99 S.Ct. 2689, 2693, 61 L.Ed.2d 433, on remand 601 F.2d 903 (5th Cir. 1979). [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 9:08 am by Kyle Persaud
McCollan, 443 U.S. 137, 99 S.Ct. 2689, 2693, 61 L.Ed.2d 433, on remand 601 F.2d 903 (5th Cir. 1979). [read post]
24 Jul 2021, 11:51 am by admin
Back in 2008, Professor Michael Green wrote an interesting paper on apportionment in asbestos litigation. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Janus didn't discuss Turner or PruneYard, and mentioned Rumsfeld only for the narrow proposition that "government may not 'impose penalties or withhold benefits based on membership in a disfavored group' where doing so 'ma[kes] group membership less attractive.'"[134] And the compelled contribution cases, of which Janus is the most recent, have drawn a line between compelling people to fund the views expressed by a particular private speaker (such as the… [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 11:04 am by Eugene Volokh
Green, 286 Or 99 (1979), held that the First Amendment only requires proof of "actual malice" to recover presumed damages "in defamation actions brought by private parties against media defendants. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 8:34 am by Eugene Volokh
Green, 286 Or 99 (1979), held that the First Amendment only requires proof of "actual malice" to recover presumed damages "in defamation actions brought by private parties against media defendants. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
In 1986, the Supreme Court gave the green light to the approach set out by the EEOC, holding, in Meritor Savings Bank v. [read post]