Search for: "People v. Green (1981)" Results 61 - 80 of 90
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
 Additionally, the compilation below does not include reports on the Justices’ confirmation hearings – for example, Nomination of Sandra Day O’Connor: Hearings Before the Judiciary of the United States (Sept. 9-11, 1981). [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 11:37 am by Katherine Gallo
Ct. (1981) 119 CA 3d 534, 552 (pdf) and experts. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 11:37 am by Katherine Gallo
Ct. (1981) 119 CA 3d 534, 552 (pdf) and experts.  [read post]
22 Oct 2011, 3:44 am by SHG
Our standard for judging whether a verdict is legally repugnant was articulated in 1981 in People v Tucker (55 NY2d 1). [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
Diehr, 450 US 175, 187 (1981).Harper & Row v. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 1:03 pm
Green Edge Enters., LLC v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 6:02 am by Bexis
App. 1981) (“under [the statute] there is no room for damages for personal injury and hence[] there can be no recovery . . . for mental pain and suffering”); Beerman v. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 6:38 am by Charon QC
My ex-wife used to roll her eyes when I said, as one does, non haec in foedera veni [Lord Radcliffe in Davis Contractors Ltd v. [read post]
10 Jul 2010, 7:12 am by James Eckert
A verdict is repugnant if an acquittal on one charge conclusively negates a necessary element of a crime for which the defendant was convicted (People v Tucker, 55 NY2d 1 [1981]). [read post]
21 May 2010, 12:07 pm by Erin Miller
The following essay by Jamal Greene is part of our thirty-day series on John Paul Stevens. [read post]
7 May 2010, 10:00 pm by Tom Goldstein
“Harvard Law Revisited,” The Green Bag. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 6:48 pm
Fed officials and many others have been talking up the economy and there has been talk of "green shoots" appearing in the economy. [read post]