Search for: "People v. Green (1995)"
Results 21 - 40
of 138
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Dec 2008, 9:53 pm
There is an urgent need to conduct new studies in today’s marketplace including assessments of consumer attitudes toward irradiation of leafy greens and other produce. [read post]
17 May 2022, 2:27 pm
(Ohio 1995) (accusations of bigotry and homophobia in newspaper opinion piece were nonactionable); Ward v. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 8:05 am
” With tens of thousands of people attending, participating, drinking green beer, and generally having a good time at St. [read post]
6 May 2019, 7:53 am
Second, the FTC Green Guides. [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 9:00 pm
Arlington (C.A.5 1995), 65 F.3d 1248; United States v. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 6:11 am
A court should not employ a presumption where to do so would “elevate a legal construct above common sense” (People v Giordano, 87 NY2d 441 [1995]). [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 9:25 am
When the Stratton Oakmont v. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 6:08 pm
In 1995, Walter Dellinger, then the head of the Office of Legal Counsel, testified before Congress on the Justice Department’s view that any action to limit birthright citizenship would be facially unconstitutional. [read post]
2 May 2016, 1:11 pm
McBride, 120 N.C.App. 623, 463 S.E.2d 403 (North Carolina Court of Appeals 1995). . . . [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 8:57 pm
Sixty-six percent of ill people were female. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 5:18 pm
[1] The quoted phrases are from the Third Circuit in Drax v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 5:16 am
” For Kearns J (citing McKenna v An Taoiseach (No.2) [1995] 2 I.R. 10) the issue of justiciability came down to whether the case involved “a clear disregard by the Government of the powers and duties conferred on it by the Constitution”. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 2:02 pm
People v. [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 12:34 pm
This could result in no postponement of limitation periods for people involved in motor vehicle accidents in which vehiclar damage occurs. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 6:42 am
The following is an essay for our symposium on Arizona v. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 1:17 pm
(People v. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 1:46 pm
People v. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 5:01 am
In Francis v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 6:02 am
App. 1995), and Kwan v. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 10:00 pm
Section 3 of the Representation of the People Act 1983 remains unamended by the rulings in Hirst v United Kingdom (No 2) (2006) 42 EHRR 849 and Greens and MT v United Kingdom (23 November 2010) that it offends against Article 3 Protocol 1 by imposing a blanket ban on prisoners from participating in elections. [read post]
