Search for: "People v. Greenfield"
Results 121 - 140
of 289
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2014, 7:59 am
Supreme Court in Brady v. [read post]
14 Jun 2008, 12:49 am
Liggett v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 3:26 am
— Scott Greenfield (@ScottGreenfield) June 27, 2018 Serving their members? [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 6:39 pm
(People v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 1:18 pm
Hart v. [read post]
8 Dec 2013, 11:14 am
(H/t to Greenfield for pointing me to it a couple of years ago.) [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 3:51 pm
In the last couple of weeks we learned that two more of the Rakofsky v. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 11:41 pm
Supreme Court granted certiorari today in the "Fantasy Baseball" case of CBC Distribution v. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 5:30 am
See Gideon v. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 5:22 am
People can't see through walls. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 10:34 pm
I didn't write about how the so-called "public-safety" exception made up by the Supremes in New York v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 3:08 am
Brother Ezor’s discussion of the judicial misunderstanding of technology in the People v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 3:35 pm
At issue was Thames Water’s liability for alleged odours and mosquito infestations affecting people living in properties near the Mogden Sewage Treatment Works in Middlesex. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 3:35 pm
At issue was Thames Water’s liability for alleged odours and mosquito infestations affecting people living in properties near the Mogden Sewage Treatment Works in Middlesex. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 12:33 am
Scene V. [read post]
17 May 2010, 7:52 pm
We don't kill kids (Roper v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 9:00 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 3:26 am
Our prisons are full of innocent people. [read post]
11 Dec 2011, 7:47 am
Ross was a volunteer (a term it appears that Antonin Scalia didn't know until oral argument in Martel v. [read post]
1 Aug 2007, 2:22 am
It seems to me that there must be a better expression to describe the latter (I'll try to find it as I write this) but the distinction between the lawyers who defend people because they have a passion for the fight (the criminal defense lawyers) and the lawyers who represent the accused because of a business decision (V-6s?) [read post]
