Search for: "People v. Gregg" Results 81 - 100 of 167
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jan 2012, 7:43 am by Steve Hall
Georgia, in which the Supreme Court ruled existing death penalty laws unconstitutional - as well as the 1976 case of Gregg v. [read post]
11 Dec 2011, 4:05 am by SHG
Georgia, and states could no longer put people to death, until the Supremes changed their mind in Gregg v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 12:10 pm by Kali Borkoski
  I suppose the initial audience is people who asked me questions at these sessions. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 1:40 pm by admin
  However, as the Supreme Court recently ruled (PDF) in Brown v. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 10:00 pm by GuestPost
  When the issue was revisited in Gregg v Georgia, the Court set broad guidelines for the constitutionality of the use of the death penalty: namely that a bifurcated process would determine who receives the death penalty. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 9:57 am by Steve Hall
In the modern era of capital punishment -- since the Supreme Court's decision in Gregg v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 11:47 pm by Jeff Gamso
  It's in his concurring opinion finding that Kentucky's lethal injection protocol had not been shown to be unconstitutional.In Gregg v. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 9:52 am by Evidence ProfBlogger
Like its federal counterpart, Colorado Rule of Evidence 803(8)(B) provides an exception to the rule against hearsay Unless the sources of information or other circumstances indicate lack of trustworthiness, [for] records, reports, statements, or data compilations, in any form, of... [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 7:19 am by Steve Hall
The Supreme Court had reinstated the death penalty in 1976 in Gregg v. [read post]
6 May 2011, 12:24 pm by Robert J. Terry
Judge acquits 3rd Baltimore officer of misconduct – Brendan Kearney In his first trial as Baltimore City state’s attorney, Gregg L. [read post]
3 May 2011, 7:16 am by Layla Kuhl
In People v Gregg, Justice Kelly dissented from the denial of the application stating that she would vacate the defendant’s sentence because the trial court erroneously punished defendant for exercising his constitutional and statutory rights by assessing 10 points for OV 19 (interference with the administration of justice). [read post]