Search for: "People v. Grey" Results 41 - 60 of 256
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jul 2020, 7:20 am by Ronald Collins
Even Professor Thomas Grey, who recognized Holmes as a pragmatist, seemed to ignore it. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 8:57 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Not just grey market but physical copies. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 2:51 pm by Xavier Beauchamp-Tremblay
Plus, the cases that most heavily discussed Rodriguez (which is, for all practical purposes, overruled by Carter v. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 6:00 am by Kevin Kaufman
By the end of World War II, over 40 percent of Americans smoked cigarettes, but today, millions of people are giving up cigarettes and only 13.7 percent of the population smokes regularly.[1] Some former smokers have substituted cigarettes with electronic cigarettes, oral smokeless tobacco, or other tobacco-free nicotine products. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 10:00 am by Eugene Volokh
First, the criminal defamation statute arguably fails to provide "people of ordinary intelligence a reasonable opportunity to understand what conduct it prohibits" and what speech is acceptable…. [read post]
8 Sep 2019, 9:43 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
One example of this is in J.I.R.L. v Criminal Injuries Compensation Board, where the Divisional Court reviewed an appeal of a decision by the CICB in relation to the quantum of his claim. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 1:14 pm by Jim Walker
”  That constitutes a clear violation of MARPOL Annex V and is a potential felony violation of the Act to Prevent Pollution from Ships. [read post]
31 May 2019, 5:47 pm by Jim Walker
She stated that “the people at the top are treating this as a gnat. . . [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 11:30 pm by Dáire McCormack-George
The internal dimension is the inherent capacity which people have—this will vary amongst populations. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 7:50 am by Eugene Volokh
Aug. 29, 2004) (noting that the trial court had upheld a narrowly drawn criminal libel statute; the defendant did not argue the First Amendment on appeal); People v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 7:50 am by Eugene Volokh
Aug. 29, 2004) (noting that the trial court had upheld a narrowly drawn criminal libel statute; the defendant did not argue the First Amendment on appeal); People v. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 8:56 am by Ronald Collins
The following is a series of questions posed by Ronald Collins to Stephen Budiansky concerning Budiansky’s book “Oliver Wendell Holmes: A Life in War, Law, and Ideas” (W.W. [read post]