Search for: "People v. Griffith" Results 101 - 120 of 182
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2015, 4:34 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 Subject v. object: is TM law descriptive or normative? [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 5:03 pm by INFORRM
It was largely thanks to the untiring efforts of people such as these that the far-sighted and patriotic Churchill could find himself described in late 1930s Britain as “unquestionably the biggest war-monger in the world today” and as a man of the ‘war psychosis’ (both quoted in Richard Griffiths&rsquo [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 1:17 pm by WIMS
Circuit, Case No. 11-1302, EME Homer City Generation, L.P v. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 10:01 am by Brendan Kevenides
 The Illinois Appellate Court took up a similar issue of statutory construction in People v. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 10:53 am by Stewart Baker
  I give the highlights of two new and eminently contestable cyberlaw rulings:  In U.S. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2022, 2:55 am by INFORRM
The rubric is the warning that traditionally appears at the top of a judgment telling people what they can and can’t do with it. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 5:30 am by INFORRM
The stories were publishable because of a year-long battle to reveal the finding by freelance journalist Louise Tickle and Press Association’s Brian Farmer (backed by Tortoise Media) (Griffiths v Tickle [2021] EWCA Civ 1882). [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 10:59 am by John Elwood
United States, 13-0639, asks whether the Eleventh Circuit’s appellate procedural default rule conflicts with the retroactivity rule established in Griffith v. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 4:04 am by INFORRM
  The seminar is discussed on the UK Human Rights Blog, Meeja Law, in the Lawyer by Catrin Griffiths (who chaired the discussion) and on the Twitter thread #lawblogs. [read post]
20 Jun 2021, 4:14 pm by INFORRM
On 17 June 2021, Griffiths J handed down judgment in the case of Webb v Jones [2021]  EWHC 1618 (QB). [read post]
6 Nov 2007, 5:45 am
(Hat tip: HobbySpace)Space race v. auctioning: Sam "big advocate of space property rights" Dinkin replies to Prof. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
(Professor Brown notes the English Court of Appeal admitted this in Loutchansky v Times Newspapers Ltd (Nos 2 – 5) [2002] 2 WLR 640 at 653.) [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 1:11 am by INFORRM
One company sent more than 415,000 text messages without valid consent, encouraging people to get “free advice”, whilst another made unsolicited calls about pensions. [read post]