Search for: "People v. Griswold" Results 21 - 40 of 231
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
  In Griswold v, Connecticut, the Supreme Court concluded that people have privacy rights that prevent the government from forbidding married couples from using contraception. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 9:00 pm by Austin Sarat
”However, to give the Third Amendment its due, we need to acknowledge that it did appear in the list of amendments that former Supreme Court Justice William Douglas used in Griswold v. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 8:00 am by Guest Blogger
  Until relatively recently, Article V and the hurdles it presented to formal constitutional amendment was seen as a feature rather than a bug, especially if one credited the constitutional theories of esteemed scholars like David Strauss or Bruce Ackerman. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 2:16 pm by Gregory Forman
  Hearn’s opinion discusses United States Supreme Court jurisprudence at the time South Carolina adopted article I, section 10, noting that Griswold v. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  The player that seems to me to be missing from this great melodrama of constitutional cynicism is we the people, that is, the democratic as well as the, well, constituent aspect of the constitution. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 9:05 pm by Victoria Hawekotte
Justice Clarence Thomas, however, argued in his concurrence that the Court should reconsider longstanding substantive due process rulings, including Griswold v. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
For a constitutional theory to be (minimally) acceptable, it must preserve the result in Brown v. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  But Harlan wrote an opinion in a case involving Connecticut’s ban on contraceptives, dismissed on technical grounds, which he then incorporated into an eloquent concurring opinion in the famous case of Griswold v. [read post]
20 Oct 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
 We observe in closing that in Dobbs v. [read post]
19 Oct 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
This is why and how the marital privacy recognized in Griswold v. [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 10:34 am by The Petrie-Flom Center Staff
” In addition to jeopardizing outcomes in cases such as Loving, Griswold, Lawrence, and Obergefell, following such guidance in Dobbs would also endanger Plyler v. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Spending in election cycles by corporations and the ultrawealthy through so-called dark money groups has skyrocketed since the 2010 Supreme Court decision Citizens United v. [read post]