Search for: "People v. Hale"
Results 121 - 140
of 375
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jul 2017, 3:10 am
The appellant was named and the case name is now Khuja (formerly known as PNM) v Times Newspapers. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 6:46 am
The Supreme Court of Canada has issued its decision in Google Inc v Equustek (28 June 2017). [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 6:46 am
The Supreme Court of Canada has issued its decision in Google Inc v Equustek (28 June 2017). [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 9:03 am
Background Few people would demur from Parliament’s acknowledgement of the vital importance of education. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 4:15 pm
Jack Gilbert, Lead Litigation Counsel for Facebook, explained that Facebook generally takes a neutral position on applications to identify people behind pages or profiles on their network. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 7:00 am
In March 2017, the Supreme Court (sitting in a panel comprising Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale, Lord Mance, Lord Kerr and Lord Hughes) heard the appeal of the Metropolitan Police Service (“MPS”) in the case of Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis v DSD & Anor. [read post]
International human rights can help reverse yet another heavy blow on sexual and reproductive health
25 Jun 2017, 5:07 am
Editor’s note: The appellant in R (o.t.a A and B) v. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 8:06 am
R (o.t.a A and B) v. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 1:55 am
Furthermore, since December 2016 the policy has been extended beyond foreign criminals to cases such as people who have overstayed their leave to remain. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 7:34 am
See also Johnson v. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 2:14 pm
Hales article “Thinking Tools: You Can Prove a Negative”]. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 8:51 am
You surely recall the Hassell v. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 4:06 pm
Canada The case of Hudspeth v Whatcott 2017 ONSC 1708 concerned a proposed class action on behalf of 500,000 people who marched on the 2016 Pride Toronto Parade. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 11:06 am
Barrett v. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 7:34 am
The minority (Lady Hale and Lords Kerr and Clarke) considered that the notice read like a mere request and should have been firmer: paragraphs 103, 122, and 155. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 1:22 pm
Pino v. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 2:58 am
Background The Supreme Court has upheld a challenge to the “named person” provisions of the Children and Young People (Scotland) Act 2014. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 9:15 am
Hales’s opinion may well be that people who pay him make superior mattresses, but that does not change the reviews, for Lanham Act purposes, from statements of opinion into statements of objectively verifiable fact. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 6:07 am
According to Lady Hale, failing to exempt A from the “bedroom tax” was discriminatory “in the sense described in Thlimmenos v Greece: treating her like any other single parent with one child when in fact she ought to be treated differently” (at [75]). [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 6:06 am
Lady Hale (Lord Carnwath agreeing) dissented in relation to A. [read post]
