Search for: "People v. Hale"
Results 141 - 160
of 374
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Dec 2008, 1:15 am
As Baroness Hale made it very clear in MacLeod, this is a job for the legislature, not the judiciary.At number three in the top ten comes McCartney v Mills. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 2:00 am
The majority, agreeing with Girvan LJ in the Divisional Court, held that the ECtHR in S and Marper v UK [2009] 48 EHRR 50 was not considering the position of convicted people [2], and confined the principles of the Strasbourg decision to the retention of data obtained from unconvicted persons. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 11:03 am
Lady Hale dissented and would have found for the employees in both case. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 2:09 am
Lord [Sky]Walker and Lord Collins wrote the judgment of the court, with Lady Hale and Lord Phillips agreeing in full. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 3:57 pm
Lady Hale accepts the validity of these criticisms and finds (para.36) that WCC gave no serious consideration to its obligations in Ms N’s case. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 2:25 pm
Parliament has further expressly provided, in sections 15 and 35, for disabled people to have rights in respect of the accommodation which they occupy which are different from and extra to the rights of non-disabled people. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 1:07 am
Lady Hale, Lord Reed and Lord Hughes concurred in both judgments. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 1:16 pm
Subsequent case law has found that the duty might (depending on the facts of specific cases) apply to the following situations: prison authorities protecting inmates from harm from other prisoners [Edwards v UK (2002) 36 EHRR 487], or from suicide [Keenan v UK (2001) 33 EHRR 913]; immigrants in administrative detention [Slimani v France (2006) 43 EHRR 49]; military conscripts [Lilinc V Turkey (App. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 7:10 am
" World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2007, 3:46 am
See Hale v. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 7:02 am
Baroness Hale, with Lord Carnwath, found (at 77) Indeed, the respondent does not seriously dispute that Ms A needs to stay where she is. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 6:55 am
’ Hale v. [read post]
16 Feb 2020, 4:52 pm
A Petition entitled “Exploiting People in the Public Eye” has been launched demanding new and stricter laws to safeguard people in the public eye and has attracted over 150,000 signatures. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 4:38 am
In relation to the provision of accommodation under the National Assistance Act 1948, my noble and learned friend, Baroness Hale of Richmond, then Hale LJ, said in R (Wahid) v Tower Hamlets London Borough Council [2002] EWCA Civ 287 [2003] HLR 13, para 33, "[n]eed is a relative concept, which trained and experienced social workers are much better equipped to assess than are lawyers and courts, provided that they act rationally". [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 11:06 am
Barrett v. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 9:10 am
Therefore, agreeing with the Government’s reasoning, Lady Hale held that: It follows that the decisions of the Court of Appeal in Akhtar and Bibi must be overruled and that this appeal must be allowed by consent in terms of the detailed order proposed. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 10:27 am
[Post by Venkat] Buckles v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 1:54 pm
Today’s lone case for argument, Franchise Tax Board of California v. [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 7:06 pm
" United States v. [read post]
