Search for: "People v. Hale" Results 141 - 160 of 375
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Dec 2016, 1:30 am by Blog Editorial
” 15.57 Eadie QC discusses the possibility of a single line Act of Parliament, which he says created a difficulty for the respondents as it makes no sense in the context where Parliament has put that very question to the people by way of a referendum. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 2:11 am by Blog Editorial
 He is arguing that it would be unconstitutional to withdraw from the EU without the consent of the people of Northern Ireland for the following two reasons: Membership of EU part of the constitutional settlement There has been transfer of sovereignty which means that the people of Northern Ireland have sovereignty over constitutional change rather than Parliament. 15:00: Scoffield QC submits that a constitutional convention may be a constitutional rule – this is… [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 1:45 am by Blog Editorial
  Lord Pannick QC says it is no answer for the Government to say that the long title to the 1972 Act “says nothing about withdrawal“. 16:04: Lord Pannick QC refers to the case of Robinson v Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, which he submits supports a “flexible response” to constitutional developments. [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 4:21 am by Edith Roberts
Yesterday, the court heard oral argument in Jennings v. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 7:02 am by Giles Peaker
Baroness Hale, with Lord Carnwath, found (at 77) Indeed, the respondent does not seriously dispute that Ms A needs to stay where she is. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 9:12 pm by Patricia Salkin
The Ferris Trust began renting the dwelling to vacationers in 2003 under the business name “Retreat at Hale Luana & Plantation. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 1:15 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The panel will be Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale, Lord Mance, Lord Sumption, Lord Carnwath, Lord Hughes, and Lord Toulson. [read post]
6 Nov 2016, 7:23 am by familoo
Because we all know that tabloid headlines are a simple reflection of the will of the people, right? [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 5:19 am by Aidan Wills, Matrix
Applying the recent ECHR cases of Genovese v Malta (2012) App no. 53124/09 and Kuric v Slovenia (2012) App no. 26828/06, Lady Hale held that ECHR, art 8 is engaged because the denial of citizenship significantly affects a person’s social identity. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 8:17 am by Alasdair Henderson
The second is that the names of the people whose cases are being decided, and others involved in the hearing, should be public knowledge. [read post]
31 Jul 2016, 12:54 pm by Giles Peaker
YA v London Borough of Hammersmith And Fulham [2016] EWHC 1850 (Admin) YA was in care with H&F for a number of years and was now a care leaver. [read post]
30 Jul 2016, 2:11 pm by familoo
Although it is a rare judgment from Lady Hale that does not reference it, it is not directly applicable in UK law. [read post]