Search for: "People v. Hale"
Results 161 - 180
of 374
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Aug 2017, 6:33 am
In the case of Ore v. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 3:00 pm
Lady Hale, the only female Justice, has certainly been vocal of late. [read post]
23 May 2009, 7:51 am
Let's go back to 1895 and the Supreme Court decision in Coffin v. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 11:20 am
He commented on the court’s commitment to quality, and the fact that a number of cases heard by the UKSC over the past year have been of considerable public interest (referring in particular to R (on the application of Prudential plc and another) v Special Commissioner of Income Tax and another, Local Government Byelaws (Wales) Bill 2012 – Reference by the Attorney General and Bank Mellat v HM Treasury). [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 4:27 pm
This was confirmed in the case of Douglas & ors v Hello! [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 4:15 am
In a media release, the penal reform charity notes that in its experience of working in prisons, carrying out research and representing young people in custody, “segregating vulnerable and disturbed people tends to make their problems worse”. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 10:27 am
As a result, 16 people were arrested for driving under the influence. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 4:39 am
We all know that there are plenty of people occupying accommodation in those two categories. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 3:30 pm
Bellotti, 435 U.S. 765, 784 (1978) (corporation has First Amendment right of free speech); Hale v. [read post]
13 May 2015, 2:09 am
This was a point of appeal from Kanu v Southwark (our report). [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 5:24 am
The law of tort is not (generally) there to punish people for their behaviour. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 5:26 am
Option 1 was rejected as too narrow, leaving the possibility that serious errors of law affecting large numbers of people would go uncorrected. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 9:30 pm
That case was Abbott Labs. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 3:07 am
Lord Hope and Lady Hale give the judgment of the Court. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 2:59 am
The Supreme Court of Canada has issued its decision in Google Inc v Equustek (2017 SCC 34). [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 11:34 am
Yusupov v. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 8:30 am
Texas and Obergefell v. [read post]
18 Apr 2009, 12:04 am
His tally is now at an astonishing 105, which is second amongst all living people. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 3:24 am
Although the judgement, given by Baroness Hale, did not mention human rights, it clearly impacts on article 8 rights to family life, and alongside the recent decision in Pinnock, could greatly increase the number of people to which local authorities are obliged to provide housing. [read post]
4 May 2022, 1:06 pm
R (Elkundi) v Birmingham and R (Imam) v Croydon (2022) EWCA Civ 601 (not on Bailii yet. [read post]
