Search for: "People v. Hale"
Results 161 - 180
of 375
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Feb 2016, 8:30 am
The first two articles are from quite possibly the most authoritative people who could speak about the Yearbook—i.e., the President and Deputy President of the UK Supreme Court. [read post]
30 Jan 2016, 4:32 am
That was the difficult question the Supreme Court had to grapple with in the case of R(C) v. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 12:33 pm
A simple overruling of Nevada v. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 7:25 am
The case is Dunn et al. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 11:15 am
See Wal-Mart Stores v. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 4:30 am
By contrast, Lady Hale felt that while it was proper to take into account public services which there was a statutory duty to supply ([94]), family support was different. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 1:00 am
I believe our chief executive and her team, our press officers, have done enormously well in public outreach and I think we now have over 100,000 people a year coming through the door. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 8:51 am
In Peoples v. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 7:38 am
It is hard to find people who do not admire that statement. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 7:30 am
He applied his Guidance on the Identification of the Ordinary Residence of People in Need of Community Care Services, England, which purported to apply the House of Lords judgment in R v Barnet LBC, ex parte Shah [1983] 2 AC 309 and Turner J’s judgment in R v Waltham Forest, ex parte Vale The Times, 25 February 1985. [read post]
19 Aug 2015, 1:30 am
Lord Kerr and Lord Hughes agreed with Lady Hale. [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 4:15 am
In a media release, the penal reform charity notes that in its experience of working in prisons, carrying out research and representing young people in custody, “segregating vulnerable and disturbed people tends to make their problems worse”. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 2:00 am
The majority, agreeing with Girvan LJ in the Divisional Court, held that the ECtHR in S and Marper v UK [2009] 48 EHRR 50 was not considering the position of convicted people [2], and confined the principles of the Strasbourg decision to the retention of data obtained from unconvicted persons. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 5:09 am
In the case of Pham (formerly “B2”), Lord Neuberger PSC, Lady Hale DPSC and Lord Mance, Lord Wilson, Lord Sumption, Lord Reed and Lord Carnwath JJSC unanimously dismissed the suspected terrorist’s appeal. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 1:00 am
The islands’ indigenous population, known as Chaogossians, was a very small community of fewer than 1,000 people who lived in extremely simple lifestyle. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 7:43 am
Thus in Pham v. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 6:45 am
But there we go – that is the “Carrollian” effect of the rule to which both Lord Neuberger and Baroness Hale referred. [read post]
21 May 2015, 4:43 am
That was on the basis of the House of Lords decision in Din v Wandsworth LBC and the Court of Appeal decision in Dyson v Kerrier DC. [read post]
20 May 2015, 3:02 am
Fortunately, and clearly correctly, the Supreme Court answers the question posed in paragraph 1 of the judgment of Lady Hale and Lord Toulson as to whether Wilkinson v. [read post]
13 May 2015, 2:09 am
This was a point of appeal from Kanu v Southwark (our report). [read post]
