Search for: "People v. Hale (1999)"
Results 1 - 20
of 29
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2015, 3:02 am
DPP (1999) 7 BHRC 375, para 20, per Sedley J. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 9:30 pm
Islam v Secretary of State for the Home Department, R v Immigration Appeal Tribunal and Another, ex parte Shah (1999) Nora Honkala72. [read post]
21 May 2014, 10:31 am
The ECtHR Chamber has delivered its decision in McDonald v UK. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 9:03 am
Background Few people would demur from Parliament’s acknowledgement of the vital importance of education. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 9:09 am
He was granted refugee status and obtained ILR in 1999. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 4:47 pm
The leading judgment for the majority was given by Lord Sumption, with a concurring judgment delivered by Lady Hale. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 8:16 am
At the end of the hearing, perturbed by the respondents’ tough predicament, Lady Hale characterised these proceedings as an “anxious case”. [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 4:15 am
The decisions to segregate the prisoners were made under the Prison Act 1952, rule 45 of the Prison Rules 1999 and PSO 1700. [read post]
14 Feb 2007, 3:46 am
See Hale v. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 3:12 am
It raises the question, which equity forces us to ask, as to why people do things. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 3:12 am
It raises the question, which equity forces us to ask, as to why people do things. [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 6:59 am
Aynes, “Bradwell v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 12:50 am
If that were true, the prosecution of E could send the wrong message to other young people being similarly exploited. [read post]
24 Feb 2013, 9:19 am
It would be odd and potentially onerous if, even while the authority were simply considering the merits of the claimant’s position, they were unable to house the family in two adjoining units even on a temporary basis.Further, Scott Baker J in R v Ealing London Borough Council ex parte Surdonja [1999] 1 ALL ER 566 took the view that:“In my judgment the obligation is not discharged by providing split accommodation in separate dwellings. [read post]
24 Feb 2013, 9:19 am
It would be odd and potentially onerous if, even while the authority were simply considering the merits of the claimant’s position, they were unable to house the family in two adjoining units even on a temporary basis.Further, Scott Baker J in R v Ealing London Borough Council ex parte Surdonja [1999] 1 ALL ER 566 took the view that:“In my judgment the obligation is not discharged by providing split accommodation in separate dwellings. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 4:52 pm
State of California (1998) 63 Cal.App.4th 1108; see People v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am
If the procedure (including an internal review) has been carried out an authority's decision can only be challenged by way of judicial review, see Manchester CC v Cochrane [1999] 1 WLR 809. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am
If the procedure (including an internal review) has been carried out an authority's decision can only be challenged by way of judicial review, see Manchester CC v Cochrane [1999] 1 WLR 809. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 1:21 pm
Smith, 996 S.W.2d 518, 521 (Mo.App. 1999). [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 4:41 pm
The Guardian reported that “Sunday People ‘hired detectives to target Milly Dowler phone” whereas Bloomberg went for the Royal angle with a piece entitled “Prince Harry Seeks Investigator Receipts in Phone Hacking Case“. [read post]
