Search for: "People v. Harders"
Results 81 - 100
of 2,117
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Aug 2011, 4:30 am
In a different, but comparable context, the court of appeals has previously held that reasonable people of ordinary prudence should know that ladders conduct electricity, Anderson v. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 7:49 pm
The trial was portrayed in The People v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 6:08 am
The harder hypothetical The harder case is what should happen if there is a causal relationship between the assertion of rights and the removal of the defendant. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 2:20 pm
(That's not intended to be a normative statement, by the way; I'm not saying that I love or hate the idea of getting around Prop. 218, just that it's always interesting to think about ways that people might try to do so and whether they'd legally succeed or fail.)The basic scoop is that voters have to approve taxes, but not fees. [read post]
12 Dec 2015, 8:20 am
It’s a case many people will be closely watching. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 1:02 pm
It is against the rules to restrict fee simple absolute transfers of real estate to certain people for certain periods of time. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 3:43 pm
Because people on the Commission are, I'm confident, not merely bureaucrats, but are rather people. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 1:01 pm
Do people charged with drug offenses who are Honduran nationals have a harder time getting bonds and/or pay a premium due to their differential ability to successfully flee? [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 12:30 pm
This is especially true now, after a recent case from the Appellate Division called State v. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 1:49 pm
As straightforward as that rule may sound, it’s much harder to apply—and is the bane of all law students taking an evidence course for the first time. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 11:06 am
Concluding Thoughts I have found that when the JOBS Act is mentioned, people tend to have one of two reactions. [read post]
1 May 2011, 1:58 pm
" Scalia was joined in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 7:00 am
My main interest in the case is how it will compare to Abigail Alliance v. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 8:08 am
Lee v. [read post]
1 Oct 2022, 10:54 am
The discussion on the Doe v. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 8:12 am
Stone v. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 11:05 am
State v. [read post]
24 Jan 2007, 10:20 am
In June 2006, we told you about a Supreme Court decision in a case called Burlington Northern v. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 8:29 am
We saw the end of the protections from Roe v. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 11:26 am
Among the losers—if Blum succeeds in eliminating the guarantee of equal representation for equal numbers of people—will be racial minorities in places like Yakima, who will, once again, find it harder to have their voices heard. [read post]
