Search for: "People v. Harmes"
Results 21 - 40
of 10,805
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2023, 3:30 am
Further, environmental toxins have disproportionate impacts on people of color and individuals of lower socioeconomic status, and after controlling for socioeconomic status or class, “people of color are more likely to be exposed to environmental harms in their communities. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 9:19 am
In State v. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 12:28 pm
Consider, for example, the decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 6:41 am
Supreme Court’s April 17, 2024, decision in Muldrow v. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 4:00 am
In R. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 12:18 pm
People tend to point at motor vehicle accidents as the biggest safety concern, so you might be surprised to learn how slip and fall incidents rank in terms of harm to victims. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 4:15 pm
On 1 December 2023, Jay J handed down judgment in Dyson v MGN Ltd [2023] EWHC 3092 (KB). [read post]
27 Oct 2015, 1:05 pm
(People v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 3:32 pm
In PLIVA v. [read post]
7 Aug 2017, 8:03 am
In Whalen v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 8:41 am
How is harm, or the risk of harm, to be determined when different people react in different ways to what they are reading or hearing? [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 8:41 am
Lachaux v Independent Print, Supreme Court to hear “serious harm” appeal On Tuesday and Wednesday 13 and 14 November 2018, the Supreme Court (Lords Kerr, Wilson, Sumption, Hodge and Briggs) will hear the appeal in Lachaux v Independent Print Limited & Anor UKSC 2017/0175, against the Court of Appeal decision of Davis LJ, with whom MacFarlane and Sharp LJJ concurred ([2017] EWCA Civ 1334). [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 1:00 pm
In Patel v. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 1:08 pm
This case emphasises the lesson from Amersi v Leslie [2023] EWHC 1368 (KB) that when approaching the issue of serious harm the tort rules of causation are still in play and should not be overlooked. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 5:52 am
A claimant cannot rely on any “presumption of publication” and must (see Al Amoudi v. [read post]
7 Aug 2022, 10:03 am
Velozny v. [read post]
13 Feb 2022, 9:03 pm
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
30 Jul 2016, 4:19 pm
In order to be defamatory, a statement must make the claimant identifiable (whether explicitly or not) and carry a meaning that adversely affects the attitude of other people towards the subject. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 5:17 pm
Post v. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 9:16 pm
v=AWJJnQybZlk [Hat tip to Michael Mills of Neota Logic for reminding me of Asimov's Three Laws.] [read post]
