Search for: "People v. Harper (2000)"
Results 21 - 40
of 55
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2019, 6:52 pm
`Michael' Pruneda, Jr., Rolando Quintana, for Elmer DeGuzman, Yolanda Lopez, Richard Wecker and Sheryl Hamer, Respondents.Alfred John Harper, III, Arrissa K. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
Court of Appeal’s ruling in R. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 10:32 am
Co. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 6:34 pm
Peterson, Arms and Armor in Colonial America 1526-1783, 215-17 (Dover reprint 2000) (Smithsonian Institution 1956). [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 5:35 pm
Boundary crossing: sharing research w/community at large v. within the pharma co. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 4:46 am
” The title itself comes from the case Joel v. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 1:15 pm
Harper v. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 5:44 am
Rogers v. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 9:46 am
Over the last month, on our New Republic: Security States newsfeed, we rolled out a series designed to explain why fairly allocating the costs of software deficiencies between software makers and users is so critical to addressing the growing problem of vulnerability-ridden code—and how such a regime will require questioning some of our deep-seated beliefs about the very nature of software security. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 6:32 am
Canadian institutions have been quite busy addressing the issues surrounding Nazi-looted art since both the Washington and Vilnius Conferences in 1998 and 2000, respectively. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 9:30 am
I think some people dismissed my post completely just based on its title—the reasoning didn’t matter since the conclusions weren’t what those people wanted to hear. [read post]
1 May 2013, 5:04 pm
In 2000 Mance L.J. said in Hyde Park Residence Ltd v Yelland: “Copyright does not lie on the same continuum as, nor is it the antithesis of, freedom of expression. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 9:07 am
In 2000 Mance L.J. said in Hyde Park Residence Ltd v Yelland: “Copyright does not lie on the same continuum as, nor is it the antithesis of, freedom of expression. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:02 am
New York: Harper and Row, 1970. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:02 am
New York: Harper and Row, 1970. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
In December 1833, the American Monthly Review commented on a newly published book by Joseph Story. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 9:47 am
E185.96.A730 1993 Regenstein Baldwin, Lewis V. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 4:00 am
Terwilliger, 126 F.3d 34, 41 (2nd Cir. 1997).545 US 913, 961 (2005) (concurrence).For example, Harper & Row Publishers v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 3:40 am
The copyright is limited to those aspects of the work—termed `expression’—that display the stamp of the author’s originality,” quoting Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 7:41 am
One recent example is the case of Ash v. [read post]
