Search for: "People v. Hart (1998)"
Results 1 - 20
of 49
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2024, 1:18 pm
Hart v. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 3:12 pm
For example, produce has, since at least 1991, been the source of substantial numbers of outbreak-related E. coli O157:H7 infections.[27] Other unusual vehicles for E. coli O157:H7 outbreaks have included unpasteurized juices, yogurt, dried salami, mayonnaise, raw milk, game meats, sprouts, and raw cookie dough.[28] According to a recent study, an estimated 93,094 illnesses are due to domestically acquired E. coli O157:H7 each year in the United… [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
14 Oct 2023, 3:00 am
” Smith v. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 1:09 pm
Co., 497 A.2d 322, 327 (R.I. 1985); Hart v. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 4:35 pm
The issue was whether the court had jurisdiction over the pleaded claim against the ninth defendant in the Claimant’s action for, inter alia, harassment, violation of the HRA 1998 and GDPR 2018. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 8:00 am
Hart Memorial Lecture on “The Work of an American Constitutional Judge. [read post]
29 May 2022, 4:05 pm
This case is the latest in a line of representative claims that have been withdrawn since the Supreme Court’s decision in Lloyd v Google, which determined that damages could only be awarded following individualised assessment, and were not available under the Data Protection Act 1998 merely for “loss of control” of personal data: proof of damage or distress was necessary. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 5:30 am
The UK Government has relaunched the campaign to overhaul the Human Rights Act 1998 in an attempt to counter what Secretary of State for Justice Dominic Raab has called “wokery and political correctness. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 2:22 pm
”) Schwab v. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 4:59 am
Hart v. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 9:33 am
Van Tatenhove yesterday in Hart v. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 5:16 pm
State v. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 4:30 am
PNP v. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 2:33 am
For example, produce has, since at least 1991, been the source of substantial numbers of outbreak-related E. coli O157:H7 infections.[27] Other unusual vehicles for E. coli O157:H7 outbreaks have included unpasteurized juices, yogurt, dried salami, mayonnaise, raw milk, game meats, sprouts, and raw cookie dough.[28] According to a recent study, an estimated 93,094 illnesses are due to domestically acquired E. coli O157:H7 each… [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 9:30 pm
St George's Healthcare NHS Trust v S (1998) Kay Lalor, Anne Morris and Annapurna Waughray70. [read post]
29 Jul 2017, 4:22 pm
27 [A.B.].[45] In Hart v. [read post]
3 May 2016, 2:30 pm
Hopefully BMG v. [read post]
2 May 2016, 8:54 pm
YouTube v. [read post]
27 Mar 2016, 2:54 pm
Section V then posits an alternative analysis, normatively autonomous (though not entirely free) of the orbit of the state, a vision possible only when the ideological presumptions of the state are suspended. [read post]
