Search for: "People v. Hawk" Results 81 - 100 of 161
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
You can separately subscribe to the Online Global Week in Review by subscribing by email, or selecting ‘all posts’ or ‘IP on the net’ for the RSS option at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: Change.gov content now under creative commons license (EFF) (Creative Commons) (Lessig) (Michael Geist) (IPKat) (TorrentFreak) (Techdirt) (Creative Commons) DMCA exemption petitions (ContentAgenda) (EFF) (Ars Technica) (EFF)… [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 8:57 am by Venkat Balasubramani
The ruling will have an effect on people trying to use takedowns to censor speech, and the court flags this as a problem. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 10:45 am by John Elwood
Hawkes Co., Inc., 15-290, involve an important question under the Clean Water Act (CWA) – which experienced speed-readers recognize as a cue to skip to the next paragraph. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 12:28 am by centerforartlaw
”[4] Matthew Butterick, an attorney for the artists alongside Joseph Saveri noted that the judge “sustained the plaintiffs’ core claim pertaining to direct copyright infringement” and expressed optimism in the claim’s path to trial and the ability to address the court’s concerns.[5] On November 29, 2023, the artists and their legal team submitted an amended complaint, 94 pages to the original complaint’s 44, adding seven artist-plaintiffs: Gerald Brom, Adam… [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 8:00 am by David Kris, Nate Jones
He is a rock-ribbed, super-hawk Republican and has been since he volunteered for Barry Goldwater more than 50 years ago. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
The features of musical culture and the ubiquity of musical borrowing reveal a dramatic divergence between the shared norms and practices of music culture and a doctrinal copyright approach.[16] Hence, there is something to be said about music as a unique category within copyright, both deserving and in need of special consideration. _____________________________________ 2 Théberge v Galerie d’Art du Petit Champlain Inc, 2002 SCC 34 at para 30. 3 CCH Canadian v Law… [read post]
19 May 2015, 3:00 am by JB
  He spent nearly two decades before his presidency as a deficit hawk and as a crusader to shrink the size of government. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 12:10 am by Josh Richman
Ron Wyden and former Congressman Chris Cox in Gonzalez v. [read post]