Search for: "People v. Haynes (1984)" Results 1 - 7 of 7
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Mar 2015, 8:20 pm by Donald Thompson
 Not every gunshot ineluctably results in serious physical injury (see, People v Gray, 30 AD3d 771 [3rd Dept 2006] [victim shot with shotgun from 20 feet away, evidence insufficient to establish serious physical injury]; see also, People v Rojas, 61 NY2d 726 [1984] [gunshot injury does not by itself establish substantial pain as required for physical injury]; People v Francis, 112 AD2d 167 [2nd Dept 1985] [same]; People… [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 1:53 pm by Stephen Bilkis
(See People v Santos, 64 NY2d 702 [1984]). [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 4:28 pm by Josh Blackman
Trucios-Haynes observed in the Georgetown Immigration Law Journal that applying the Supreme Court’s Establishment Clause jurisprudence to long-standing immigration laws “is particularly awkward. [read post]
26 Mar 2007, 7:06 am
Haynes Forensic and Litigation Consulting, Washington, D.C. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 12:31 am
In other words, people have differing opinions of food. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
In December 1833, the American Monthly Review commented on a newly published book by Joseph Story. [read post]