Search for: "People v. Heard" Results 61 - 80 of 7,647
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Mar 2018, 11:26 am by Jeffrey Carr
I’m sure we’ve all seen or heard ads with a stern-voiced lawyerly looking actor telling us about the dangers of a particular drug. [read post]
7 May 2019, 4:27 pm by Injury at Sea
A Coast Guard helicopter hoisted all five people and brought them to Sitka, uninjured. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 3:48 pm
 So the trial court booted the defendant, then let the trial go on with no one there for him -- including the direct examination of the victim -- and then let him back in only to cross-examine the main witness . . . having never heard her testimony on direct?! [read post]
15 Feb 2022, 10:52 am
  With the various extensions of time for the filing of briefs and the reporter's transcripts, the appeal didn't even get heard (much less decided) until pretty much everything was basically already mooted by the passage of time.Does that make the appeal moot? [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 10:38 am by Robert Sewell
The Supreme Court recently heard arguments on the case of Snyder v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 11:32 am
 As you have undoubtedly heard by now, on June 24, 2022, the United States Supreme Court overturned Roe v. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 5:22 am by Alison Macdonald, Matrix
On 12-13 November, the Supreme Court (Lords Neuberger, Kerr, Dyson, Hughes and Hodge) heard the case of Beghal v Director of Public Prosecutions, a challenge to the broad power of detention contained in Schedule 7 to the Terrorism Act 2000. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 6:54 am
 The Alamo it was not when the US Supreme Court (motto: "Not political unless it's abortion or gun rights") heard the case of US v. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 7:47 am
Over at my Legal Blog Watch Beat, I posted about the Walmart v. [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 2:01 pm by admin
Earlier this month, the United States Supreme Court heard argument in the case of Beach Renourishment v. [read post]
3 Sep 2018, 8:38 am by JEMIMA LOVATT
The Supreme Court heard the case of Reilly v Sandwell Metropolitan Borough Council [2018] UKSC 16 in which it considered the duty of Reilly, a headteacher at a school, to disclose her relationship with a man called Mr Selwood who was convicted making indecent images of children. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 2:02 pm
" Tamara could be heard saying, "That's bullshit Javier. [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 1:39 pm by Eugene Volokh
But that argument—which was actually made by Justices Goldberg and Douglas (and largely echoed by Justice Black) in New York Times v. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 12:49 pm by Suraj Vyas
"That sentence has been heard about 500 million times by people all around the world. [read post]