Search for: "People v. Heard (1993)"
Results 141 - 160
of 288
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm
Redistricting — which is "primarily the duty and responsibility of the State" (Perry v Perez, 565 US 388, 392 [2012] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]; see Growe v Emison, 507 US 25, 34 [1993]) — is a complex and contentious process that, historically, has been "within the legislative power . . . subject to constitutional regulation and limitation" (Matter of Orans, 15 NY2d 339, 352 [1965]). [read post]
30 Aug 2020, 7:21 pm
In 2006, the Supreme Court of Canada heard the case in Childs v. [read post]
25 Dec 2022, 2:14 am
The purpose is to show that this defendant was put in fear by these people. [read post]
24 Mar 2019, 7:47 pm
(K.G.), 1993 CanLII 116 (SCC), [1993] 1 S.C.R. 740, [1993] S.C.J. [read post]
9 Apr 2011, 3:48 pm
American Savings Bank, 508 U.S. 324, 327, 113 S.Ct. 2106, 124 L.Ed.2d 228 (1993); see also §§ 301(a), 1321; Fed. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 11:45 am
State v. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 9:50 am
Supreme Court case Brady v. [read post]
14 May 2010, 9:10 am
"I've just expressed concerns on the basis of what I've heard about the law. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 7:41 pm
Rev. 913, 913 (2016). [8] Sanborn v. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 10:06 am
X v. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 9:00 pm
Have you heard the rhetoric that a Biden administration signals a “decline” in religious liberty? [read post]
6 May 2010, 7:16 pm
I’ve also heard firsthand testimonies of people that lived in El Salvador during those years. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 5:01 am
The “conspiracy” part of “seditious conspiracy” can apply to a whole bunch of people. [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 3:48 pm
In Caldor Inc., v. [read post]
14 Oct 2019, 6:00 am
The Supreme Court’s decision in Minnesota v. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 3:27 am
The plea gets its name from 1970’s North Carolina v. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 7:06 am
Garg v. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 10:30 am
More on Ledell Lee v. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am
Ramos v. [read post]
11 Apr 2021, 4:07 pm
Yet public opinion ultimately shifted decisively in favor of same-sex marriage, and in Obergefell v. [read post]
