Search for: "People v. Herring (1993)" Results 121 - 140 of 971
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Oct 2015, 2:37 pm by Michael Lumer
United States, 10 MC 712 (RJD), in which he addressed a request for expungement from Dawn Stephenson, who Judge Dearie had sentenced in 1993 to one day of imprisonment, several months of home confinement, and four years of supervised release following her plea to bank fraud. [read post]
12 May 2010, 1:40 am by INFORRM
  In 1993 she wrote a review of Anthony Lewis’s book on New York Times v Sullivan , under the title “A Libel Story: Sullivan Then and Now” (1993) Law and Social Inquiry, 197-217. [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 9:38 am by Eugene Volokh
(A Maine trial court took the same view in 1993, but its analysis was similarly weak.) [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 3:34 pm by Stephen Bilkis
As a corollary to the right to criminal counsel, non-English speaking individuals have the right to an interpreter to enable them to participate meaningfully in their trial and assist in their own defense (see People v Ramos, 26 NY2d 272, 274 [1970]; People v Perez, 198 AD2d 446, 447 [1993]; People v De Armas, 106 AD2d 659). [read post]
21 May 2008, 7:33 pm
The AP reports: It's the first appeals court ruling in the country that evaluates "don't ask, don't tell" in light of Lawrence v. [read post]
17 May 2008, 4:22 am
On Thursday, Davis wrote that neither side presented the 1993 decision to him. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 2:40 pm
Blawgletter's mom celebrated her birthday on July 2 (the 69th such occasion for her). [read post]
24 Nov 2011, 12:51 pm by Mark S. Humphreys
The style of the case is, "Stan Stumph, d/b/a Concrete Concepts/Dallas Fire Insurance Company v. [read post]
24 Nov 2011, 12:51 pm by Mark S. Humphreys
The style of the case is, "Stan Stumph, d/b/a Concrete Concepts/Dallas Fire Insurance Company v. [read post]
7 Jun 2007, 6:10 am
A horrible set of facts confronted the First Department yesterday in People v Dickerson, 2007 NY Slip Op 04718 where the Court had to decide whether the starvation constituted depraved indifference murder, or criminally negligent homicide. [read post]