Search for: "People v. Holding (1987)"
Results 1 - 20
of 680
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Aug 2020, 1:53 pm
Cardenas (1987) 192 Cal.App.3d 51, 58; see generally People v. [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 9:44 am
In People v Stith (69 NY2d 313 [1987]) the Court of Appeals held that the People must timely object to a defendant's failure to prove standing in order to preserve that issue for appellate review. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 6:43 am
This issue is discussed in a 1987, Texas Supreme Court case styled, The Aetna Casualty and Surety Company v. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 5:10 am
We previously answered this question in the affirmative in People v Stith (69 NY2d 313, 506 N.E.2d 911, 514 N.Y.S.2d 201 [1987]), and reiterate that holding today. [read post]
22 Jul 2007, 12:18 pm
., Steinberg v. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 6:52 am
In Commonwealth v. [read post]
13 Feb 2021, 7:11 pm
People v. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 6:15 pm
In April, 2008 the Court of Appeals in People v Sparber (10 NY3d 457 [2008]), held that only a judge, and not prison or court clerks can impose Post Release Supervision [PRS], even when sentencing courts failed to pronounce PRS as required by law. [read post]
10 May 2010, 11:37 am
And the DUIs are in 1987, 1997 and 2001? [read post]
5 Aug 2007, 3:19 pm
Shuman (1987, holding that mandatory death sentences are invalid -- even for prison inmates serving a life sentence who are convicted of a murder in prison), Riggins v. [read post]
1 Jun 2007, 10:39 am
App. 1974) (arrest for reckless driving and driving without valid license); People v. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 12:03 pm
But a far more liberal Texas Supreme Court than our present one noted back in 1987 that the plaintiff's burden of proof in these cases was "onerous" in the landmark decision of El Chico Corp. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 9:10 am
This new edition includes expanded coverage of the Roberts Court’s juvenile justice decisions including Miller v. [read post]
24 Apr 2008, 9:35 am
Red Bull GmbH v. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 6:40 am
Co. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 4:35 pm
Compare Kanter v. [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
Isleib, 319 N.C. 634 (1987). [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 2:38 pm
Ayers v. [read post]
8 Feb 2022, 6:07 am
The Court of Appeals holds these guidelines do not violate the First Amendment.The case is Reynolds v. [read post]
1 Sep 2022, 5:01 am
Ct. 1987, 1997 (2022) (holding that exclusion of religious institutions from generally available funding programs is generally unconstitutional). [read post]
