Search for: "People v. Holmes"
Results 41 - 60
of 754
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Sep 2013, 1:30 pm
A year later, according to at least one recent source it was Brandeis who persuaded Holmes to dissent in Milwaukee Social Democratic Publishing Co. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 11:48 am
I think that those actual expectations, proven time and again in practice, speak volumes about what people's expectations are. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 12:20 pm
The case, People v Holmes, involved a high-profile defendant in a criminal case (the person who shot up the Colorado movie theatre – allegedly), but these cases should not turn on whether the person claiming a privacy right is sympathetic. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 4:53 am
In SONY BMG Music Entertainment v. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 8:29 pm
Cruz thus argues that Justice Holmes’s opinion in Missouri v. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 3:14 pm
People can get passionate about their pets. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 6:00 am
Datta at first thought Holmes was joking, but later grew concerned as their exchange progressed; she advised Holmes to get help. [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 6:22 am
The two cases are Holmes v. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 4:06 am
As a follow up to my tongue-in-cheek post last Friday about language from judicial opinions I want to mention something that's bothered me for a while now, and see if people think I'm being over-sensitive: the jocular riffing on Justice Holmes's "Three generations of imbeciles is enough" language from Buck v. [read post]
14 Aug 2022, 6:00 am
An example of this use of the bad man thought experiment is provided in Justice Souter's opinion in Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 10:11 am
I think Justice Holmes put it well in Cowley v. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 10:45 pm
If the state or federal governments wish to forcibly vaccinate people, they will have to rely on Buck v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 4:13 am
In Bass v. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 5:02 am
—Holmes, Gitlow v. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 3:15 pm
(HT: Lisa Milot) Related Posts: Taxing Eggs: A Mini-Symposium Taxing Eggs: Introduction to Perez v. [read post]
3 May 2011, 7:16 am
In People v Laidler the Court asked the parties to address “whether, for purposes of offense variable 3, Dante Holmes was a victim and, even if Holmes was not a victim, whether the defendant could appropriately be scored 100 points for offense variable 3 on the theory that ‘death result[ed] from the commission of a crime and homicide is not the sentencing offense. [read post]
31 May 2007, 11:50 pm
This is Part Four of my review of Bruce Ackerman's Holmes Lectures, "The Living Constitution," 120 Harv. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 10:19 am
The real loser in that election, Justice John Paul Stevens said in his dissent in Bush v. [read post]
17 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Modern originalists are leapfrogging over the Taft era to resurrect an older, anti-Federalist tradition of strict construction and textualism that dates back to Spencer Roane and John Taylor’s response to McCulloch v. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 8:55 am
" The following passage from Justice Holmes's dissent in Eisner v. [read post]
