Search for: "People v. House (1970)"
Results 41 - 60
of 498
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2006, 8:17 am
Thurman of the Magistrate Court in Lee County, Ga., said his state's many fees, known there as add-ons, were a backdoor way to make poor people pay for the free lawyers guaranteed to them by the United States Supreme Court's decision in Gideon v. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 12:50 am
And I was watching the boss of it all promoting the ship, perhaps the ugliest sea going vessel since the coracle was invented, a floating 1970s council estate, on BBC news this morning. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Inst. v. [read post]
8 May 2011, 3:25 pm
The 1999 guidance then in force, given under s.7 Local Authority Social Services Act 1970, stated: A number of the children and young people who fall within the remit of YOTs will also be children in need, including some whose needs will include safeguarding. [read post]
8 May 2011, 3:25 pm
The 1999 guidance then in force, given under s.7 Local Authority Social Services Act 1970, stated: A number of the children and young people who fall within the remit of YOTs will also be children in need, including some whose needs will include safeguarding. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 5:00 pm
Instead, it was the Congress of the 1970s that wrote a broad statute – and the Supreme Court of 2006 that interpreted that statute to (more or less) require EPA to regulate greenhouse gas emissions from automobiles (Massachusetts v. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 1:23 am
The ‘license’ lets stratagem was knocked on the head by the 1985 case of Street v. [read post]
1 Jan 2016, 1:13 pm
The post Just walk away (beforehand) by Giles Peaker appeared first on Nearly Legal: Housing Law News and Comment. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 10:33 am
In Locke v. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 7:03 am
Toppi told Brennan to take him to his mother's house in Cambridge, which Brennan did. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 9:52 am
Basketball superstars Jordan v. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 5:24 am
The fact that a consultation was in favour of the charging scheme or that most people believe that fixed charges are cheaper than metered supply does not amount to a presumption of fairness. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 5:24 am
The fact that a consultation was in favour of the charging scheme or that most people believe that fixed charges are cheaper than metered supply does not amount to a presumption of fairness. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 1:01 am
Supreme Court, including Swann v. [read post]
10 Nov 2018, 5:14 am
US (not yet) US. v. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 3:36 am
See Milkovich v. [read post]
17 Nov 2021, 5:14 am
But the Supreme Court’s invalidation of the legislative veto in INS v. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 12:00 am
PEOPLE v. [read post]
5 Nov 2021, 5:01 am
Among them is House of Representatives v. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 1:19 pm
Ltd. v. [read post]
