Search for: "People v. Israel" Results 1 - 20 of 891
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jan 2024, 9:01 am by Just Security
Nevertheless, the evident logic is that it had in mind that Israel had a right to defend its territory and its people in the wake of the horrific October 7 attacks. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 6:06 am by James A. Goldston
In the wake of last week’s pathbreaking International Court of Justice order of provisional measures concerning alleged genocide in Gaza, much reaction has rightly addressed the ramifications for international diplomacy, Israel, South Africa, the United States and the Palestinian people. [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 1:45 pm
But this latest version would still allow people who boycott to be slapped with criminal financial penalties. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 8:51 pm by Steve Gottlieb
Hamas not only sparked a predictable response but violated international law by hiding among the very people it was supposed to protect and defend so that Israel would inevitably injure civilians. [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 12:15 pm
The Supreme Court made this clear with its landmark decision in NAACP v. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 11:30 am
The bill would amend existing law to prohibit people in the United States from supporting boycotts targeting Israel — making it a felony to choose not to engage in commerce with companies doing business in Israel and its settlements in the occupied Palestinian territories. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 5:55 am by Tess Bridgeman
Israel By Amichai Cohen (@amichaic) and Yuval Shany (@yuvalshany1) (February 1, 2024) Strategic Litigation Takes the International Stage: South Africa v Israel in Its Broader Context By James A. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 8:15 am by Alaa Hachem
” As evidence of genocidal intent, South Africa points to both repeated statements made by Israeli State representatives, including the Prime Minister and President, and the conduct of Israel’s military operation in Gaza, including what it says is their “failure to provide or ensure essential food, water, medicine, fuel, shelter and other humanitarian assistance for the besieged and blockaded Palestinian people” and its sustained bombardment that has forced… [read post]
Nicaragua specifically alleged that Israel violated the Article I ban on genocide (under the Article II definition), are liable for punishment under Article III, must be punished under Article IV, and that a trial should follow under Article VI with all Contracting Parties already having enacted legislation outlawing genocide under Article V. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 12:29 pm by JURIST Staff
Hundreds of people took to the streets in Accra to join the pro-Palestine protest following Israel’s retaliation. [read post]
Some Palestinian fighters returned fire against the IDF troops in what one observer called, “[V]ery difficult. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm by Samuel Estreicher and Klara Nedrelow
”[21] Israel contended that “the statements relied upon by South Africa as containing genocidal rhetoric were all taken out of context and in fact were made in reference to Hamas, not the Palestinian people as such. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 5:33 am by Benjamin Wittes
Will it be a state in which one ethnicity dominates another—the prospect that many people see in the recent passage by the Knesset of a new Basic Law on Israel as the nation state of the Jewish people? [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 5:55 am by Victor Kattan
While most of these reports concerned apartheid in Southern Africa, several States, such as Qatar, referred to Israel’s policies and practices toward the Palestinian people as falling within the territorial scope of Article II of the 1973 Apartheid Convention. [read post]
8 Aug 2020, 12:55 am by INFORRM
Comparative human rights law Baldassi & Others in 2020 reaches the same conclusion as the Supreme Court of the United States in National Association for the Advancement of Colored People v. [read post]