Search for: "People v. Ives"
Results 41 - 60
of 2,593
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Mar 2024, 12:24 pm
[Professor Shugerman's argument that the 1793 Hamilton Document, that is, a list of "every person holding any civil office or employment under the United States, (except the judges)," was intended to ensure compliance with the Constitution's Sinecure Clause lacks support.] [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 2:42 pm
The case may be better understood as a political gesture, operationalizing the “promise” made in Obergefell v. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 6:05 am
In the 1990s, courts across the country dismissed a slate of cases in which states argued that the federal government had violated Article IV of the Constitution by failing to prevent a supposed “Invasion” of undocumented migrants. [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 7:49 am
” People v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 8:00 am
[How private universities can use Boy Scouts v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 7:30 am
Yet in Griswold v. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm
Today, people may assume that the American system never allowed such a broad conception of impeachment. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 6:00 am
A PSC is defined as an individual who satisfies one of the following conditions: (i) has direct or indirect ownership of more than 25% of a company’s shares; (ii) has direct or indirect control of more than 25% of a company’s voting rights; (iii) has direct or indirect rights to appoint or remove a majority of the board of company directors or equivalent management body; (iv) exercises or has the right to exercise significant influence or control over a company; or (v)… [read post]
18 Feb 2024, 9:54 am
” On iv) the available evidence did not establish that the claimant’s anti social behaviour arose in consequence of her disabilities. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 3:33 pm
Bose Corp. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 1:23 pm
[iv] Why Pay Him More? [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Ct. 1731, 1755 (2020) (Alito, J., dissenting) (statutory words “mean what they conveyed to reasonable people at the time they were written” (citation omitted)); Kisor v. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 3:05 pm
” iv. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 10:48 am
That the petitioner has the ability and motivation to drive safely and within the law. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 3:44 pm
According to the USSC: 9% had little or no prior criminal history (Criminal History Category I); 7% were CHC II; 8% were CHC III; 2% were CHC IV; 5% were CHC V; 9% were CHC VI. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 12:01 am
[See Prigg v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 12:34 pm
Nicaragua specifically alleged that Israel violated the Article I ban on genocide (under the Article II definition), are liable for punishment under Article III, must be punished under Article IV, and that a trial should follow under Article VI with all Contracting Parties already having enacted legislation outlawing genocide under Article V. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 4:09 pm
Defined at (iv) above, bare comment is more easily understood by way of example. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am
Lash's response to the Amar brothers' amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 2:52 am
Background In Dr David Miller v University of Bristol [2024] ET 1400780/2022, the claimant was appointed Professor of Political Sociology at the University from 1 September 2018. [read post]
