Search for: "People v. Ives" Results 61 - 80 of 2,581
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2017, 10:00 pm
Designs can leave some people spinning aroundAlthough it is a case management decision, there are so many hints in the recent decision Spin Master v PMS [2017] EWHC 1477 (Pat) that Mr Justice Carr wants the judgment to get wider circulation. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 10:00 pm
Designs can leave some people spinning aroundAlthough it is a case management decision, there are so many hints in the recent decision Spin Master v PMS [2017] EWHC 1477 (Pat) that Mr Justice Carr wants the judgment to get wider circulation. [read post]
24 Mar 2019, 6:46 am by Philip Segal
Get ready for college admissions scandals phase II, and maybe III, IV and V. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 3:44 pm by David Kopel
Finally, Part V examines the efficacy of citizen arms against mass murdering governments. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 11:08 am
Title IV requires telecommunications service providers to make services available to people with hearing and speech impairments. 47 U.S.C. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 2:16 pm
It is to be noted that the key is whether the defendant has been afforded an opportunity to refute those aggravating factors which may have negatively influenced the court as held in People v. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 4:30 am by Michael Madison
I’ve learned a lot in conversation and reading over the last decade from many, many people. [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 8:08 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Fed courts have many costs v. a modest process that is a slap on the wrist—but should also make it easier for © owners to find out who these people are. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 1:02 pm
It is against the rules to restrict fee simple absolute transfers of real estate to certain people for certain periods of time. [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 3:32 pm by Patricia Hughes
Former attorney general Jody Wilson-Raybould’s resistance to the pressure by various actors to instruct the director of public prosecutions to offer to negotiate a remediation agreement (the Canadian name for a deferred prosecution agreement) with SNC-Lavalin and her testimony before the House Judiciary Committee have been explained in different ways: respect for the rule of law and the role of the attorney general, a lack of pragmatism or political experience, too much sense of self, a desire… [read post]