Search for: "People v. J.M."
Results 41 - 53
of 53
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Oct 2011, 4:00 am
Madam Justice J.M. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 2:27 pm
”The ruling in J.M. v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 5:01 am
LEXIS 1238 (May 23, 2011): We hold that, like the officers in [People v. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 8:36 am
The Supreme Court’s decision this week in Aruna Shanbaug v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 11:25 am
”[7] Judges charged with making these custody decisions “rarely received the expert testimony of native people who could familiarize [them] with traditional child-rearing practices,” but instead relied upon the testimony of non-Indian social workers who were ignorant of the ways and traditions of Native Americans.[8] These social workers often advised courts that the abject poverty of many Indian families prevented them from properly parenting their… [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 11:25 am
”[7] Judges charged with making these custody decisions “rarely received the expert testimony of native people who could familiarize [them] with traditional child-rearing practices,” but instead relied upon the testimony of non-Indian social workers who were ignorant of the ways and traditions of Native Americans.[8] These social workers often advised courts that the abject poverty of many Indian families prevented them from properly parenting their… [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 6:00 am
In Juan Torres v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:30 pm
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 2:09 pm
Molina v. [read post]
13 Feb 2010, 1:32 pm
State v. [read post]
20 Sep 2009, 12:35 am
If a victim has had a lot of sex with a lot of people, well then, maybe the victim was not really raped. [read post]
28 Mar 2009, 5:43 am
Some Reflections on the Pros and Cons of a Wide Margin of Appreciation in the Case of Sahin v. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 10:07 am
To prove causation under New York law, a plaintiff may refer to court opinions, texts, laboratory standards or scholarly articles in an effort to determine whether a particular concept has been generally accepted by the relevant scientific community and, absent such materials, the court may take testimony of expert witnesses (People v Wesley, 83 NY2d 417, 611 NYS2d 97 [1994]; see also, Demeyer v Advantage Auto, 9 Misc 3d 306, 797 NYS2d 743 [Sup Ct, Wayne County 2005]).Once… [read post]
