Search for: "People v. Jackson (1991)" Results 61 - 80 of 96
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Oct 2009, 12:34 pm by Silverberg Zalantis LLP
The City argued that under the Court's prior holding in Society of Plastics Industry, Inc. v County of Suffolk (77 NY2d 761 [1991]) that Petitioners lacked standing because the closest of them lives half a mile from the project. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 12:34 pm by Silverberg Zalantis LLP
The City argued that under the Court's prior holding in Society of Plastics Industry, Inc. v County of Suffolk (77 NY2d 761 [1991]) that Petitioners lacked standing because the closest of them lives half a mile from the project. [read post]
24 May 2023, 6:37 am by Paula Junghans
DA Office: “[T]he People further refer defendant to certain facts, among others, set forth in the Statement of Facts relating to … disguising reimbursement payments by doubling them and falsely characterizing them as income for tax reasons Court filing in response to defendant’s request for bill of particulars. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 3:00 am by Joshua Holt
We’re talking about people with at least an eight digit net worth. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 2:09 pm by NL
The Defendants argued that Redstone v Welch and Jackson [2009] EG 98 (our report here) should be followed in interpreting Abbey National v Cann [1991] AC 56 and Whale v Via Systems [2002] EWCA Civ 480. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 2:09 pm by NL
The Defendants argued that Redstone v Welch and Jackson [2009] EG 98 (our report here) should be followed in interpreting Abbey National v Cann [1991] AC 56 and Whale v Via Systems [2002] EWCA Civ 480. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 9:56 pm by Orin S. Kerr
Contrast Sawyer with the Michigan Supreme Court's decision from this May in People v. [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 9:59 am by Eric Turkewitz
I was looking for someone who had fought uphill battles for people in need. [read post]
4 May 2012, 7:31 am by Robert Chesney
As I noted on Tuesday, Adis Medunjanin was convicted this week in connection with the NYC subway bombing plot. [read post]
1 May 2009, 3:48 am
[Ed.: Court notes that the decision is without prejudice to her right to pursue claims under GERA - the Government Employee Rights Act of 1991; for more on GERA see 29 CFR 1603 here]Ø Purchase v. [read post]