Search for: "People v. Jarvis"
Results 41 - 60
of 77
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Nov 2015, 6:14 am
Before he ever took his first law class, he served as his own lawyer, filing the original complaint in what is now called Shapiro v. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 11:10 pm
To quote the Supreme Court’s brief summary of the law from Forsyth County v. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 8:19 pm
P., V. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm
The Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association and its president Jon Coupal (crusaders for lower taxes in California who have made extensive use of the initiative process for decades) filed a petition in state court seeking to block Proposition 49 from appearing on the November ballot. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court’s recent case of Burwell v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 10:57 am
Given the dangers and concerns that have been outlined, I think not,” he wrote in Bird v. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 6:44 pm
* * * “In Furman v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 11:53 pm
By Gretchen Goetz and Helena Bottemiller By March of last year, lean finely textured beef (LFTB) had reached celebrity status under the unfavorable moniker “pink slime. [read post]
13 Jan 2013, 8:55 am
Today marks the 10th anniversary of Balkinization.Although the blog officially started on January 10th, 2003, the first substantive posts, on the thirtieth anniversary of Roe v. [read post]
17 Dec 2012, 2:30 am
See Jeff Jarvis here; Mathew Ingram here. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 5:27 pm
[Week commencing 13 August] Full Fact v Evening Standard, Clause 1, 17/08/2012; Joseph Horner v The Observer, Clause 1, 16/08/2012; Mr Christopher Mackin v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 15/08/2012; Jane Hughes v The Independent on Sunday, Clause 1, 15/08/2012; Dr Yannis Alexandrides v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 15/08/2012; Mr Oliver Gray v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 15/08/2012; Alex Jarvis v Daily Mail, Clauses 3, 5, 15/08/2012; Inspired Thinking… [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 7:39 pm
Years later, we had the V-Roys from back east -- but that's another post entirely. [read post]
29 May 2012, 2:19 am
Lord Denning Jarvis v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 4:33 am
Journalism and regulation The PCC has ruled on a new case: A Woman v Clevedon People, clauses 3 (privacy) and 14 (confidential sources). [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 5:23 am
And then there’s Jeff Jarvis (author of What Would Google Do? [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 8:32 am
" It written by Craig Jarvis and John Frank. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 10:43 am
Circuit, A Quaker Action Group v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 6:46 am
At NOLA.com, Jarvis DeBerry criticizes the Court’s opinion last Term in Connick v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 7:28 am
The Ipkat today reported ‘The soccer side and the flip side: copying biographical works’ a copyright decision (Jodgon and Jarvie v Isaac and Notting Hill Movies (2011)) which helps illustrate this concept of substantial copying well. [read post]