Search for: "People v. Jarvis" Results 41 - 60 of 77
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Nov 2015, 6:14 am by Jim Sedor
Before he ever took his first law class, he served as his own lawyer, filing the original complaint in what is now called Shapiro v. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
The Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association and its president Jon Coupal (crusaders for lower taxes in California who have made extensive use of the initiative process for decades) filed a petition in state court seeking to block Proposition 49 from appearing on the November ballot. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
Supreme Court’s recent case of Burwell v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 10:57 am
Given the dangers and concerns that have been outlined, I think not,” he wrote in Bird v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 11:53 pm by Gretchen Goetz
By Gretchen Goetz and Helena Bottemiller By March of last year, lean finely textured beef (LFTB) had reached celebrity status under the unfavorable moniker “pink slime. [read post]
13 Jan 2013, 8:55 am by JB
Today marks the 10th anniversary of Balkinization.Although the blog officially started on January 10th, 2003, the first substantive posts, on the thirtieth anniversary of Roe v. [read post]
17 Dec 2012, 2:30 am by INFORRM
See Jeff Jarvis here; Mathew Ingram here. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 5:27 pm by INFORRM
[Week commencing 13 August] Full Fact v Evening Standard, Clause 1, 17/08/2012; Joseph Horner v The Observer, Clause 1, 16/08/2012; Mr Christopher Mackin v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 15/08/2012; Jane Hughes v The Independent on Sunday, Clause 1, 15/08/2012; Dr Yannis Alexandrides v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 15/08/2012; Mr Oliver Gray v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 15/08/2012; Alex Jarvis v Daily Mail, Clauses 3, 5, 15/08/2012; Inspired Thinking… [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 7:39 pm
Years later, we had the V-Roys from back east -- but that's another post entirely. [read post]
14 May 2012, 4:33 am by INFORRM
Journalism and regulation The PCC has ruled on a new case: A Woman v Clevedon People, clauses 3 (privacy) and 14 (confidential sources). [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 5:23 am by Editor Charlie
And then there’s Jeff Jarvis (author of What Would Google Do? [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 8:32 am by Steve Hall
"  It written by Craig Jarvis and John Frank. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 6:46 am by Joshua Matz
At NOLA.com, Jarvis DeBerry criticizes the Court’s opinion last Term in Connick v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 7:28 am by Shireen Smith
The Ipkat today reported ‘The soccer side and the flip side: copying biographical works’ a copyright decision (Jodgon and Jarvie v Isaac and Notting Hill Movies (2011)) which helps illustrate this concept of substantial copying well. [read post]