Search for: "People v. John (1983)"
Results 141 - 160
of 333
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Feb 2016, 4:57 pm
Johns River Water Mgmt. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 4:57 pm
Johns River Water Mgmt. [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 11:23 am
Odgen, and John T. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 8:32 am
Williamson County District Attorney John M. [read post]
28 Aug 2020, 12:30 pm
Way back in 1983, in Bearden v. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 3:35 pm
A high court majority rejected Johnson's application for a stay of execution and his petition for review in which he raised the Eighth Amendment challenge.Justice John Paul Stevens, joined by Justice Stephen Breyer, dissented, saying Johnson’s situation was “as compelling a case” as he had encountered raising the constitutional concerns that Stevens himself raised in a 1995 dissent from another denial of certiorari: Lackey v. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 9:48 pm
Pursuant to the California Supreme Court's opinion in Hubbart v. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 5:43 pm
Georgia (1972) 408 U.S. 238, until rendered moot by the California Supreme Court decision in People v. [read post]
29 Dec 2020, 10:45 am
I get the constitutional principles involved and realize that people like Rosa Parks or John Lewis did not win many friends in their broader community by advancing constitutional principles. [read post]
19 Oct 2006, 5:08 pm
John's L. [read post]
27 Nov 2018, 8:05 am
In Monday’s argument in Nieves v. [read post]
18 Jan 2008, 3:58 am
Dretke, and Snyder v. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
See Mein v. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 12:30 pm
So writes The Onion in an amicus brief urging the Supreme Court to take up Novak v. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 3:10 pm
Photo Credit: John H. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 11:29 am
People v. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 10:45 am
John Elwood reviews Monday’s relisted cases. [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 6:43 am
So, people can lie but computers can't . . . at least not yet . . . . [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 12:25 pm
United States v. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 8:12 am
Perhaps most interestingly, the issue in the case also pits the federal government against various native peoples, and various native peoples against other native peoples. [read post]
