Search for: "People v. Johnson (2000)" Results 81 - 100 of 288
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2010, 6:22 am
Defendant contends that plaintiff's conduct was "criminal in nature" even if his intoxication prevented him from forming an intention to cause injury and therefore from committing intentional assault (see Penal Law § 120.00 [2]), because proof of voluntary intoxication does not negate recklessness (see Penal Law § 15.05 [3]; People v Johnson, 277 AD2d 702, 704 [2000], lv denied 96 NY2d 831 [2001]). [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 3:05 pm by LundgrenJohnson
And so are the people who write and argue over rules. [read post]
18 Sep 2021, 6:42 am by Russell Knight
“In Illinois…the owner of property has an absolute right to dispose of his property during his lifetime in any manner he sees fit” Johnson v. [read post]
15 Sep 2018, 9:17 am by Randy Barnett
Johnson quote, which I read yesterday as the guiding light for the lower court judges and all judges. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 7:13 am by Kalvis Golde
At the Chicago Daily Law Bulletin (subscription required), Daniel Cotter looks to past precedent in U.S. v. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 11:13 am
To highlight this position, the Court referred to the Seventh Circuit decision of Mead Johnson v Abbot Laboratories (2000) where the Court considered whether the phrase "1st Choice of Doctors" could be misleading (picture, left - picture of the product with the blue ribbon in left hand corner). [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 9:28 am
  As a result of the vague standards set out in the statute the courts have developed a test to determine whether a nonprofit hospital is entitled to tax exemption.[7]            The test was first articulated in Methodist Old Peoples Home v. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 1:30 pm
  The decision in Reidel v. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 5:00 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  If yes, the law is little changed as a practical matter, and the same people will be convicted, by and large. [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 8:10 am by Michael C. Dorf
Wardlow, 528 U.S. 119 (2000)), and the Roberts court turned a blind eye, more recently, to racialized policing on the ground and the over-policing of certain communities by permitting searches to be excused even if they were completely unlawful (e.g., in Utah v. [read post]