Search for: "People v. Jones (1984)" Results 1 - 20 of 148
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Nov 2011, 10:39 am by Derek Bambauer
Yesterday, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the U.S. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 7:53 am by Tom Goldstein
Having reflected more on the decision, I now think that in some respects Jones is still less of a pro-privacy ruling than many people initially thought. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 6:38 pm by Donald Thompson
 With respect to grand jury proceedings, the district attorney has a “duty of fair dealing to the accused” (People v Pelchat, 62 NY2d 97, 105 [1984]; see also, People v Lancaster, 69 NY2d 20, 26 [1986]) and to the court (People v Ianniello, 21 NY2d 418, 424 [1968]). [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 6:34 am by Marc DeGirolami
Jones, about the constitutionality of installing GPS tracking devices to vehicles, Orin Kerr reports having heard the phrase or some reference to 1984 at least 5 times by several Justices. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 6:17 am by David Oscar Markus
In November, it will hear arguments in United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 6:46 am by ASAD KHAN
Comment With up to 3500-4500 detainees at any given time, the UK operates one of the largest immigration detention estates in Europe and 30,000 people are detained annually. [read post]