Search for: "People v. Jones (1996)"
Results 1 - 20
of 184
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2024, 11:33 am
Egilman’s affidavit, and the plaintiffs’ counsel’s briefs, which were considered and rejected by Judge Jones.[10] Egilman’s affidavit in connection with the so-called Oregon hearings, which took place during the summer of 1996, was not a particularly important piece of evidence. [read post]
20 Jan 2024, 9:24 pm
State, 267 Ga. 41, 42, 472 S.E.2d 683, 685 (1996) (“[A] conflict of interest would arise if a defense attorney were to ‘switch sides’ and prosecute his former client. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 6:04 am
’ Hearing At hearing, counsel for Dr O’Doherty extended the bases of his application, and contended that the proceedings ought also to be struck out under section 8 of the Defamation Act 1996 (which provides that the court may dispose summarily of the claim if it ‘has no realistic prospect of success’), and under the so-called Jameel principle articulated in Jameel v Dow Jones [2005] EWCA Civ 75 (since the cost of pursuing proceedings was… [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 3:05 am
On 13 December 2023, there was a hearing of an application for strike out in the data protection case of Pacini v Dow Jones before HHJ Parkes KC. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 3:06 pm
Echoing the film’s resurrection, the copyright in The Passion of Joan of Arc once lapsed, only to be revived in 1996 by the Uruguay Rounds Agreements Act. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 11:17 am
Nelson,…517 U.S. 25 (1996). [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 12:32 pm
In 2022, the Veteran Benefits Administration (“VBA”) paid $120.7 billion to 5.9 million people in compensation benefits. [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 11:27 pm
All the wrong people will celebrate. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 6:37 am
The court’s decision in Jones v. [read post]
18 May 2023, 6:11 pm
Whren, 517 U.S. 806 (1996) and People v. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 11:31 am
One example, the appellate decision in Rosen v. [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 2:30 am
Comm’rs v. [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 5:05 pm
ShareOn Tuesday, the justices will hear argument in Jones v. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 4:14 am
Juston Jones reports for the New York Times. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 9:52 am
On the other side are cases like Rumsfeld v. [read post]
15 Sep 2022, 1:24 pm
Rather, proper deference is to the community of experts, all of the people who have spent their careers and considerable talents accumulating knowledge in their field. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 5:35 am
In that respect, Pennsylvania's law is influencing what Fox in New York is allowed to say to people all over the country (indeed, all over the world). [read post]
20 Aug 2022, 12:54 pm
Though, this 1996 change is quite old. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 5:00 pm
And these were people hellbent on killing and destroying people’s lives. [read post]
23 May 2022, 9:40 am
The question in Shinn v. [read post]
