Search for: "People v. Jordan and People v. Alvarez" Results 1 - 8 of 8
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Apr 2018, 8:48 am by Chinmayi Sharma
Alvarez-Machain (described below), which counsels against creating new corporate liability. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:30 am by Josh Blackman
Johnson, 921 F.3d 991, 1010 (11th Cir. 2019) (en banc) (Jordan, J., dissenting) (when it comes to precedent with a "shaky originalist foundation . . . there is always the option of declining to broaden it—of refusing to extend it one inch beyond its previous contours"); People v. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 8:05 am by Andrew Hamm
” Briefly: Following Lucia v. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 7:01 am by Alexander Gibson
Jordan Discart, who was the first to sue, became the class representative. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 6:56 am by centerforartlaw
The shoes were filled with holy water sourced from the Jordan River and adorned with religious symbols, including a miniature crucifix and the inscription “MT. 14:25,” referencing the biblical passage describing Jesus walking on water.[20] Despite not being endorsed or made by Nike, the Jesus Shoes gained popularity and were worn by celebrities like Drake. [read post]