Search for: "People v. Kay"
Results 241 - 260
of 267
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Nov 2009, 9:20 am
There are few people who can put up with me for 10-hours straight, but we both had a great time. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 9:48 am
the decisions in Qazi, Kay and Doherty. [read post]
15 Oct 2009, 8:50 am
The two cases before the court were Godfrey v. [read post]
19 Jul 2009, 2:07 pm
Perhaps the most rigorous defender of the original intentions version of originalism has been Richard Kay in a series of very careful articles.Yet another challenge to original-intent originalism was posed by Jefferson Powell's famous article, The Original Understanding of Original Intent, published in 1985. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 5:38 am
(International Law Office) United States US Patents – Decisions BPAI: Merely outputting from a computer suffices under Bilski: Ex parte Dickerson (12:01 Tuesday) US Copyright How many people have been sued in recording industry’s legal war on file-sharing? [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 1:00 am
Frangopoulos kai Sia OE v Nomarkhiaki Avtodiikisi Korinthias (Class 46) L’Oréal wins decision against Bellure to prevent comparative advertising: L’Oréal v Bellure (The IP Factor) Who speaks for the European majority? [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
(Spicy IP) Design v copyright: need for a clear and rational distinction: Microfibres v Giridhar & Co & Ors (Spicy IP) Madras High Court: jurisdiction - can design infringement case can be filed in Court where plaintiff resides? [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
(Spicy IP) Design v copyright: need for a clear and rational distinction: Microfibres v Giridhar & Co & Ors (Spicy IP) Madras High Court: jurisdiction - can design infringement case can be filed in Court where plaintiff resides? [read post]
18 May 2009, 3:46 pm
Kay Bell, in her Don’t Mess With Taxes Blog, writes: "Laurence H. [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 8:14 am
It's going to take all of us working together in the Senate to get the 60 votes necessary to deliver the change the American people deserve. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 8:11 pm
It can be granted on a temporary basis, very quickly, and even without advance notice to the person it affects.JUSTICE PREVAILSThe British Columbia case of Kay Minge v. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 3:22 pm
Maurice Kay LJ then considered whether it was disproportionate to deny a right of residence to a person in the position of the appellant, particularly in the light of Baumbast v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2002] ECR I-7091. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 6:11 pm
In Kopecky v Slovakia (2005) 41 EHRR 944 it was said that A1P1 "does not guarantee the right to acquire property". [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 8:26 am
This is from Peter V. [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 5:39 pm
See U.S. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 9:55 pm
Their Lordships declined to vary or amend Kay v Lambeth in the light of this appeal or the last minute submissions on McCann v UK. [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 5:47 am
The case, Jordan v. [read post]
13 May 2008, 1:19 pm
As many people have already emailed me to tell me (alright, four people, all of them lovely), McCann v United Kingdom 19009/04 was handed down today. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 2:00 am
Protecting computer programs under the Copyright Act: Dais Studios v Bullet Creative: (IP Down Under), Assessing copyright risk in new classroom technologies: (IP Down Under), Cadbury loses battle over exclusive use of colour purple for chocolate wrapping in its case against Darrell Lea: (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog), (IP Down Under), (IPKat), (IPwar’s), Employee or independent contractor? [read post]
16 Mar 2008, 10:41 am
Perhaps the most rigorous defender of the original intentions version of originalism has been Richard Kay in a series of very careful articles. [read post]
