Search for: "People v. Keenan" Results 161 - 180 of 188
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Nov 2011, 10:09 am
Quite how all these people will proceed without Legal Help I don't know. [read post]
5 May 2015, 3:47 am by Sean Patrick Donlan
 Historically, land title registration systems have been an important tool in the legal displacement and criminalisation of indigenous people in settler colonies. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 12:20 am by Karwan Eskerie
Reference was also made to Keenan v United Kingdom (2001) 33 EHRR 38, where inadequate medical records, lack of recourse to specialist psychiatric input, segregation and punishment were found to amount to degrading treatment in respect of a mentally ill person. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 1:16 pm by Matthew Hill
Subsequent case law has found that the duty might (depending on the facts of specific cases) apply to the following situations: prison authorities protecting inmates from harm from other prisoners [Edwards v UK (2002) 36 EHRR 487], or from suicide [Keenan v UK (2001) 33 EHRR 913]; immigrants in administrative detention [Slimani v France (2006) 43 EHRR 49]; military conscripts [Lilinc V Turkey (App. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 8:40 am
In Missouri under the case Keenan v Miriam Foundation, the Plaintiff does not have to establish prior violent crime if the Defendant assumed the duty to provide exterior security doors. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 6:05 pm
Even with this low-ball estimate, Obama can see that hospitals kill more people than terrorists. [read post]
7 May 2012, 7:00 am by 1 Crown Office Row
The European Court in M.S. v United Kingdom has not carved out a right to treatment; it has extended the right to be protected from indignity in detention that is already well-recognised in its jurisprudence (Keenan v United Kingdom). [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 6:49 am by David Markus
” The circuit judges followed with a ruling two weeks ago in the securities fraud case of United States v. [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  If this seems too bleak a view of the Court, consider that this is exactly what the Court did in Vega v. [read post]