Search for: "People v. Keene"
Results 21 - 40
of 514
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2023, 8:22 am
Moore v. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 7:42 am
You really want people switching between abc and 123 when your whole field of vision is available? [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 7:08 am
Doe 1 v. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 7:07 pm
He then proceeds to introduce the case that brings us all to the Miami federal courthouse—or, rather, that brought us here 27 hours ago: The United States of America v. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 9:07 am
AN INTRODUCTION TO E. [read post]
2 May 2023, 10:13 am
Last summer, the need to further turn our attention to the states was thrown into sharp relief following the Supreme Court’s egregious decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
1 May 2023, 4:05 pm
More pointedly, the Court has not seemed keen on revisiting its Fourth Amendment policing doctrines that make public carry for Black people particularly precarious. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 5:11 pm
How do you measure the risk of freedom of expression v. copyright takedowns? [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 4:39 am
People, 33 Ill. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 5:16 am
(For more on this, see Chambers v. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 9:52 am
Henderson v. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 4:44 am
In this post, Luke Arnold, Associate in the Real Estate team at CMS, previews the case of Rakusen v Jepson and Ors, which is due to be heard by the UK Supreme Court on 26 January 2023. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 6:56 am
” The status of the morning after pill has been a key issue since the Supreme Court overruled Roe v. [read post]
4 Jan 2023, 4:36 pm
The government isn't keen on that idea, but defendant is psyched for it, and the trial judge (Judge Du, in Nevada) thinks it's the best option. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 8:21 am
Insofar as Mostyn J had previously determined otherwise in cases such as DL v SL [2015] EWHC 2621 (Fam); [2016] 1 WLR 1259 and Appleton v Gallagher, he was wrong: Gallagher at [33]-[34]. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 9:11 am
Citing the Supreme Court’s decision in Patton v. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 1:35 pm
Amanda Rice argues remotely in Lange v. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
[7] And he has become a keen student of, and contributor to, debates on the unconstitutional constitutional amendment doctrine. [read post]
4 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
Yet the members of the current Court have a keen understanding of the long, dark chapters in the story of American democracy, as well as an acute awareness of the structural devices that have impeded public sentiment from registering in elections, appointments, and policy more broadly. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 5:00 am
In West Virginia v. [read post]
