Search for: "People v. Kerr"
Results 61 - 80
of 726
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2018, 7:01 am
In Friday’s Carpenter v. [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 9:01 pm
I suspect that many people hold a similar view. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 11:51 am
(Orin Kerr) In 2011, the U.S. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 1:00 am
Lord Kerr’s answer to both questions was a firm no. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 2:25 pm
Very few people have any idea what the FCC regulations say about 911 caller ID. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 3:39 pm
Corfield v. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 10:14 am
My other books include The Grasping Hand: Kelo v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 6:17 pm
(Orin Kerr) In Kappos v. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 8:02 am
In Carpenter v. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 9:46 pm
(Orin Kerr) I’ve blogged a lot about the Ninth Circuit’s en banc case in United States v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 10:26 pm
(Orin Kerr) Next week, the Supreme Court will be hearing oral argument in Kentucky v. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 4:43 pm
He also claimed that leaflets published and distributed by police on 16 August 2010 which again contained CCTV images of young people involved in rioting identified the appellant”. [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 7:20 pm
Finally, he litigated and won New York Times v. [read post]
12 Jan 2018, 1:20 pm
See also Minnesota v. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 8:13 pm
(Orin Kerr) The case is Facebook, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 12:45 pm
That happened, for example, in INS v. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 8:04 am
(Orin Kerr) Jess Bravin of the Wall Street Journal has a very interesting article on the dispute among two plaintiff’s attorneys involved in Florence v. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 12:07 pm
(Orin Kerr) Reading Tim Sandefur’s first guest post, I have a quick clarifying question. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 11:46 pm
(Orin Kerr) On Monday, the Second Circuit handed down a very important decision on standing to challenge secret surveillance programs in Amnesty International USA v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 11:50 pm
(Orin Kerr) On November 8th, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in United States v. [read post]
