Search for: "People v. Kerr"
Results 101 - 120
of 727
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Aug 2011, 4:31 pm
(Orin Kerr) Thanks to Lyle Denniston, I learned today that the Justice Department has just filed its brief in United States v. [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 5:51 pm
But that’s a decision based on values that requires picking the least bad of the options, and of course different people will disagree on those values. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 2:00 am
The majority, agreeing with Girvan LJ in the Divisional Court, held that the ECtHR in S and Marper v UK [2009] 48 EHRR 50 was not considering the position of convicted people [2], and confined the principles of the Strasbourg decision to the retention of data obtained from unconvicted persons. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 3:09 am
Lords Kerr and Wilson gave a joint dissenting judgment. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 3:53 am
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in City of Ontario v. [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 5:13 am
Introduction On 13 May 2020, the Supreme Court handed down judgment in the case of R v Adams (Appellant) (Northern Ireland) [2020] UKSC 19. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 10:24 am
I am pleased to report that the Third Circuit has entered a ruling in United States v. [read post]
6 Apr 2008, 3:54 pm
US v. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 7:03 am
By Kerr's reckoning, their arguments were "essentially playing out the majority and dissenting opinions in United States v. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 7:00 am
U.S. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2008, 6:38 pm
People v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 12:21 am
(Orin Kerr) The Seventh Circuit decided an interesting Wiretap Act case today that was largely a replay of United States v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 12:50 pm
(Orin Kerr) A few readers have flagged a new district court decision, Clements-Jeffrey v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 12:39 pm
V. [read post]
6 Aug 2017, 4:42 pm
Lords Kerr and Wilson gave a joint dissenting judgment. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 1:04 pm
And different people will have different views about what the baseline should be. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 10:27 pm
The cheap point is that Marbury v. [read post]
Case Comment: R (Steinfeld & Anor) v Secretary of State for International Development [2018] UKSC 32
28 Jun 2018, 7:15 am
Judgment in the case of R (Steinfeld & Anor) v Secretary of State for International Development [2018] UKSC 32 is here. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 4:56 am
My comment begins: Utah v. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 4:45 am
Now the US Supreme Court in a case styled Utah v. [read post]
