Search for: "People v. King (2000)" Results 1 - 20 of 246
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Oct 2014, 6:38 pm by Donald Thompson
Assigned counsel promptly moved within five days of his appointment to dismiss the indictment on the ground that defendant had improperly been denied her right to testify before the Grand Jury.see also, People v Mason, 176 AD2d 356 [2nd Dept 1991] [five day period extended where new counsel is assigned]; People v Backman, 274 AD2d 432 [2nd Dept 2000] [same]. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 2:34 pm by Kevin
So this is another major problem with King Allan’s claim to the throne via almost 2000 years of “unbroken primogeniture”; he’s not telling us what he thinks he can prove, it’s not clear what exactly he would have to prove, and that’s setting aside his almost-certain lack of any evidence to prove it. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 8:00 am by Zuri Blackmon
The IRS Criminal Investigation Division, which helps send people to prison for crimes such as tax evasion, money laundering and identity theft, opened 3,019 cases in fiscal 2017, compared with 3,395 in 2016. [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 5:41 pm by Maseeh Moradi
Though Kennedy is no political liberal—his votes in Bush v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 3:31 pm
The much-awaited Supreme Court oral argument in King v. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 10:12 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
A clash between culture and law: A comparative look at the conflict between quiet title actions in Hawaii, the Kuleana Act of 1850, and the displacement of Indigenous people. [read post]
25 Aug 2021, 3:02 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Hamilton Textiles v Estate of Mate, 269 AD2d 214 [2000]; Estate of Burke v Repetti & Co., 255 AD2d 483 [1998]). [read post]
11 Jul 2007, 1:10 am
COURT OF APPEALSSECOND CIRCUITCriminal PracticeResentencing Under 2000 Guidelines Required; Use of 2002 Guidelines Violated Ex Post Facto Clause United States v. [read post]