Search for: "People v. Kinney" Results 21 - 39 of 39
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Dec 2012, 12:23 pm by admin
Her post on digital estate planning got a lot of deserved attention and got many people thinking about that important subject.2. [read post]
22 Dec 2012, 12:23 pm by Dennis
Her post on digital estate planning got a lot of deserved attention and got many people thinking about that important subject. 2. [read post]
22 Dec 2012, 12:23 pm by Dennis
Her post on digital estate planning got a lot of deserved attention and got many people thinking about that important subject.2. [read post]
13 May 2012, 4:46 pm by Lawrence Higgins
But even if it's just treated as symbolic expression, it is still constitutionally protected, as cases such as Texas v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 1:59 am
 When pasteurization started to become more mainstream early last century, some people were suspicious of the technology. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 5:00 am by Kevin
 Kinney was on a golf course in Florida at the time, probably with people fleeing in all directions. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 1:49 pm by Bexis
  Briefly, courts have adopted the learned intermediary rule because:Warnings go to physicians because they are the only people who know both a particular patient’s medical history as well as the risk/benefit profile of the drug/device being prescribed.Limiting warning duties to physicians makes the common law consistent with warning duties imposed by the FDA.Routing prescription drug/device information through the doctor preserves the physician/patient relationship from outside… [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 5:03 pm by Colin O'Keefe
What did people do before they could broadcast dispirited song lyrics to hundreds of acquaintances? [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 5:09 am
Kinney of Kinney Recruiting for anonymously bashing BCG online. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 11:50 am
Pfizer, Inc., 153 S.W.3d 758, 762 (Ky. 2004) (not a holding, but dictum suggesting broad comment k application).Louisiana: Kinney v. [read post]
31 May 2007, 1:15 pm
This case might make a good student law review article.Defendant exercises his right to represent himself at his first criminal trial and makes various statements during closing argument that, let's say, are less than well-advised (e.g., are incriminating). [read post]